Sidekick by Sorted Food vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Sidekick by Sorted Food

Sorted Food
App Store
$281/mo
~$3.4K/yr · 15K installs
VS

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Too Good To Go
App Store
$2.88M/mo
~$34.56M/yr · 75.6M installs
Revenue winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +1024724% vs other
Installs winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +505737% vs other
MAU winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +222294% vs other
Rating winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +10% vs other

Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 10248× more per month than Sidekick by Sorted Food - $2.88M vs $281.
  2. Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste charges $10.00/mo vs Sidekick by Sorted Food's $4.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.6M lifetime installs vs Sidekick by Sorted Food's ~15K - 5058.4× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste sits at 4.93★ vs 4.48★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Sidekick by Sorted Food
vs
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$281
▶
$2.88M
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.4K
▶
$34.56M
Lifetime installs (est.)
15K
▶
75.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
2K
▶
3.9M
App Store rating
4.48★
▶
4.93★
Total ratings
299
▶
504K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$4.99
▶
$10.00
IAP tiers detected
8 tiers
◀
0 tiers

Sidekick by Sorted Food

Sorted Food
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Oct 23, 2019
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
99.3 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.4.0
Languages
English
View full Sidekick by Sorted Food report →

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Too Good To Go
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 8, 2015
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
141.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
26.5.0
Languages
EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
View full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report →

Sidekick by Sorted Food trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Sidekick by Sorted Food App Store page →Too Good To Go: End Food Waste App Store page →

Related comparisons

Fussy Toddler Recipes iOS vs Sidekick by Sorted Food iOSSidekick by Sorted Food iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidLove Manuela iOS vs Sidekick by Sorted Food iOSDoordash Food Grocery More iOS vs Sidekick by Sorted Food iOS7 Eleven Rewards Shopping iOS vs Sidekick by Sorted Food iOSMcdonald S iOS vs Sidekick by Sorted Food iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Sidekick by Sorted Food or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $2.88M per month, while Sidekick by Sorted Food earns about $281. That is a 10248.2× revenue gap (~$2.88M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Sidekick by Sorted Food ≈ $3.4K/year, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $34.56M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Sidekick by Sorted Food or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.6M estimated downloads vs 15K for Sidekick by Sorted Food - a 5058.4× gap. Sidekick by Sorted Food's App Store downloads are estimated from 299 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 504K ratings.
Are Sidekick by Sorted Food and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Sidekick by Sorted Food and Too Good To Go: End Food Waste offer? v
Sidekick by Sorted Food: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. Sidekick by Sorted Food runs a "Subscription (~$5.00/mo)" monetization model; Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Sidekick by Sorted Food or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Sidekick by Sorted Food 299 ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 504K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Sidekick by Sorted Food vs Too Good To Go: End Food Waste revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $281 for Sidekick by Sorted Food and $2.88M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Sidekick by Sorted Food or Too Good To Go: End Food Waste to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.