Site Audit Pro vs Gallery

Site Audit Pro earns about $400.8K per month, while Gallery earns about $147.8K. That is a 2.7× revenue gap (~$253.0K more per month for Site Audit Pro). Annual revenue: Site Audit Pro ≈ $4.81M/year, Gallery ≈ $1.77M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

Gallery leads with about 5.4M estimated downloads vs 1.2M for Site Audit Pro - a 4.7× gap. Site Audit Pro's App Store downloads are estimated from 11K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Gallery reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.

Yes - both apps sit in the Productivity category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

Site Audit Pro: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Gallery: IAP range $1.99 - $39.99 per item. Site Audit Pro runs a "Paid app ($12.90)" monetization model; Gallery runs "Subscription (~$8.92/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

Site Audit Pro edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.7 (gap of 1.1 stars). Rating volume: Site Audit Pro 11K ratings, Gallery 51 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $400.8K for Site Audit Pro and $147.8K for Gallery are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Productivity) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.