Slimming World vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness

Slimming World

Slimming World
App Store
$3.3K/mo
~$39.5K/yr · 16K installs
VS

Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness

Zwift, Inc
App Store
$391.5K/mo
~$4.70M/yr · 2.3M installs
Revenue winner Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness wins +11808% vs other
Installs winner Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness wins +14835% vs other
MAU winner Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness wins +14777% vs other
Rating winner Slimming World wins +1% vs other

Why Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness earns roughly 119× more per month than Slimming World - $391.5K vs $3.3K.
  2. Aggressive pricing. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness undercuts at $19.99/mo vs $24.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  3. Bigger install base. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness has ~2.3M lifetime installs vs Slimming World's ~16K - 149.3× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Slimming World
vs
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.3K
$391.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$39.5K
$4.70M
Lifetime installs (est.)
16K
2.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
4K
605K
App Store rating
4.78★
4.74★
Total ratings
314
21K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$24.99
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
=
1 tiers

Slimming World

Slimming World
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Aug 26, 2019
Last updated
Jun 23, 2026
File size
103.2 MB
Content rating
17+
Version
1.91
Languages
English
View full Slimming World report →

Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness

Zwift, Inc
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Dec 10, 2016
Last updated
Jul 2, 2026
File size
3.62 GB
Content rating
4+
Version
1.116.2
Languages
English
View full Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness report →

Slimming World trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Slimming World or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness earns about $391.5K per month, while Slimming World earns about $3.3K. That is a 119.1× revenue gap (~$388.3K more per month for Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness). Annual revenue: Slimming World ≈ $39.5K/year, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness ≈ $4.70M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Slimming World or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness leads with about 2.3M estimated downloads vs 16K for Slimming World - a 149.3× gap. Slimming World's App Store downloads are estimated from 314 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 21K ratings.
Are Slimming World and Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Slimming World and Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness offer? v
Slimming World: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Slimming World runs a "Subscription (~$24.99/mo)" monetization model; Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness runs "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Slimming World or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Slimming World edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Slimming World 314 ratings, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness 21K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Slimming World vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.3K for Slimming World and $391.5K for Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Slimming World or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.