Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer vs Swift PDF Reader
Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer
Olasmg Digital
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.0M installs
VS
Swift PDF Reader
MD.GOLAM NOBI AKASH
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 52K installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer wins
+3690% vs other
MAU winner
Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer wins
+1779% vs other
Rating winner
Swift PDF Reader wins
+6% vs other
Why Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bigger install base. Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer has ~2.0M lifetime installs vs Swift PDF Reader's ~52K - 37.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.0M
◀
52K
Monthly active users (est.)?
114K
◀
6K
App Store rating
4.33★
▶
4.58★
Total ratings
11K
◀
85
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Tools
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 13, 2025
- Last updated
- May 8, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.1.5
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Tools
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 30, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 10, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.6
- Languages
- -
Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer trajectory
Swift PDF Reader trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer or Swift PDF Reader? v
Swift PDF Reader earns about $0 per month, while Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer ≈ $0/year, Swift PDF Reader ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer or Swift PDF Reader? v
Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer leads with about 2.0M estimated downloads vs 52K for Swift PDF Reader - a 37.9× gap. Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Swift PDF Reader reports 50,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer and Swift PDF Reader in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Tools category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer and Swift PDF Reader have in-app purchases? v
Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Swift PDF Reader does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Swift PDF Reader runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer or Swift PDF Reader? v
Swift PDF Reader edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer 176 ratings, Swift PDF Reader 6 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer vs Swift PDF Reader revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer and $0 for Swift PDF Reader are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Tools) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Smart PDF Reader & PDF Viewer or Swift PDF Reader to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
