sofatutor vs Classiホーム
sofatutor
sofatutor GmbH
App Store
$202/mo
~$2.4K/yr · 7K installs
VS
Classiホーム
Classi Corp.
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.0M installs
Revenue winner
sofatutor wins
+20200% vs other
Installs winner
Classiホーム wins
+15802% vs other
MAU winner
Classiホーム wins
+7712% vs other
Rating winner
sofatutor wins
+416% vs other
Why sofatutor is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- sofatutor earns roughly 202× more per month than Classiホーム - $202 vs $0.
- Subscription model. sofatutor runs a $39.99/mo subscription that compounds; Classiホーム relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- More monetization surfaces. sofatutor runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
- Better app store reviews. sofatutor sits at 4.16★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full sofatutor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
sofatutor
vs
Classiホーム
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$202
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.4K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
7K
▶
1.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
752.4
▶
59K
App Store rating
4.16★
◀
-
Total ratings
132
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$39.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Education
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 21, 2013
- Last updated
- Apr 14, 2026
- File size
- 13.2 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.0.0
- Languages
- English, German
- Category
- Education
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Mar 3, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.0.32
- Languages
- -
sofatutor trajectory
Classiホーム trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, sofatutor or Classiホーム? v
sofatutor earns about $202 per month, while Classiホーム earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$202 more per month for sofatutor). Annual revenue: sofatutor ≈ $2.4K/year, Classiホーム ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, sofatutor or Classiホーム? v
Classiホーム leads with about 1.0M estimated downloads vs 7K for sofatutor - a 159.0× gap. sofatutor's App Store downloads are estimated from 132 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Classiホーム reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are sofatutor and Classiホーム in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Education category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do sofatutor and Classiホーム offer? v
sofatutor: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Classiホーム: no IAP detected on the public listing. sofatutor runs a "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)" monetization model; Classiホーム runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, sofatutor or Classiホーム? v
sofatutor edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.2 stars). Rating volume: sofatutor 132 ratings, Classiホーム 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these sofatutor vs Classiホーム revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $202 for sofatutor and $0 for Classiホーム are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Education) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare sofatutor or Classiホーム to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.