StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner vs onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner
Next Vision Limited
App Store
$209.7K/mo
~$2.52M/yr · 2.8M installs
VS
onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps
onXmaps
Google Play
$266.6K/mo
~$3.20M/yr · 8.8M installs
Revenue winner
onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps wins
+27% vs other
Installs winner
onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps wins
+216% vs other
MAU winner
onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps wins
+55% vs other
Rating winner
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner wins
+3% vs other
Why onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Subscription model. onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps runs a $31.61/mo subscription that compounds; StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps has ~8.8M lifetime installs vs StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner's ~2.8M - 3.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner
vs
onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$209.7K
▶
$266.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.52M
▶
$3.20M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
▶
8.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
327K
▶
509K
App Store rating
4.69★
◀
4.55★
Total ratings
23K
▶
65K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$31.61
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Sports
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 24, 2025
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 125.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.10.1
- Languages
- Czech, Dutch, English, French, German, Italian +6 more
- Category
- Sports
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 8, 2013
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner trajectory
onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner or onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps? v
onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps earns about $266.6K per month, while StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner earns about $209.7K. That is a 1.3× revenue gap (~$56.9K more per month for onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps). Annual revenue: StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner ≈ $2.52M/year, onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps ≈ $3.20M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner or onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps? v
onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps leads with about 8.8M estimated downloads vs 2.8M for StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner - a 3.2× gap. StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 23K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner and onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Sports category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner and onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps offer? v
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner: IAP range 3 tiers detected. onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps: IAP range $9.99 - $99.99 per item. StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner runs a "Free + one-time IAP (3 tiers)" monetization model; onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps runs "Subscription (~$31.61/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner or onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps? v
StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner 23K ratings, onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps 22K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner vs onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $209.7K for StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner and $266.6K for onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Sports) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare StarSnap: Sports Card Scanner or onX Hunt: Offline Hunting Maps to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.