Super Meat Boy Forever vs The Past Within Lite
Super Meat Boy Forever
Headup
Google Play
$3.4K/mo
~$41.2K/yr · 289K installs
VS
The Past Within Lite
Rusty Lake
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 5.6M installs
Revenue winner
Super Meat Boy Forever wins
+343700% vs other
Installs winner
The Past Within Lite wins
+1841% vs other
MAU winner
The Past Within Lite wins
+1241% vs other
Rating winner
The Past Within Lite wins
+12% vs other
Why Super Meat Boy Forever is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Super Meat Boy Forever earns roughly 3437× more per month than The Past Within Lite - $3.4K vs $0.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Super Meat Boy Forever report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Super Meat Boy Forever
vs
The Past Within Lite
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.4K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$41.2K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
289K
▶
5.6M
Monthly active users (est.)?
40K
▶
539K
App Store rating
3.67★
▶
4.12★
Total ratings
4K
▶
8K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Adventure
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Apr 20, 2023
- Last updated
- Dec 8, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 6755.1849.1962.1410
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Adventure
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 12, 2022
- Last updated
- Oct 28, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- 1.1.5
- Languages
- -
Super Meat Boy Forever trajectory
The Past Within Lite trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Super Meat Boy Forever or The Past Within Lite? v
Super Meat Boy Forever earns about $3.4K per month, while The Past Within Lite earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$3.4K more per month for Super Meat Boy Forever). Annual revenue: Super Meat Boy Forever ≈ $41.2K/year, The Past Within Lite ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Super Meat Boy Forever or The Past Within Lite? v
The Past Within Lite leads with about 5.6M estimated downloads vs 289K for Super Meat Boy Forever - a 19.4× gap. Super Meat Boy Forever reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. The Past Within Lite reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Super Meat Boy Forever and The Past Within Lite in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Adventure category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Super Meat Boy Forever and The Past Within Lite have in-app purchases? v
Super Meat Boy Forever does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. The Past Within Lite does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Super Meat Boy Forever runs "Paid app ($0.99)", The Past Within Lite runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Super Meat Boy Forever or The Past Within Lite? v
The Past Within Lite edges ahead with ★ 4.1 vs ★ 3.7 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: Super Meat Boy Forever 287 ratings, The Past Within Lite 125 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Super Meat Boy Forever vs The Past Within Lite revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.4K for Super Meat Boy Forever and $0 for The Past Within Lite are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Adventure) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Super Meat Boy Forever or The Past Within Lite to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.