Threads vs eAgora
Threads
Instagram, Inc.
App Store
$103.56M/mo
~$1.24B/yr · 327.8M installs
VS
eAgora
eAgora
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 395K installs
Revenue winner
Threads wins
+10355709700% vs other
Installs winner
Threads wins
+82911% vs other
MAU winner
Threads wins
+116063% vs other
Rating winner
Threads wins
+464% vs other
Why Threads is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Threads earns roughly 103557097× more per month than eAgora - $103.56M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Threads runs a $21.99/mo subscription that compounds; eAgora relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Threads has ~327.8M lifetime installs vs eAgora's ~395K - 830.1× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Threads runs 3 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Threads report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Threads
vs
eAgora
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$103.56M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.24B
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
327.8M
◀
395K
Monthly active users (est.)?
145.9M
◀
126K
App Store rating
4.64★
◀
-
Total ratings
1.9M
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$21.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Social Networking
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 5, 2023
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 187.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 428.0
- Languages
- Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +25 more
- Category
- Social
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 9, 2013
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.4.2
- Languages
- -
Threads trajectory
eAgora trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Threads or eAgora? v
Threads earns about $103.56M per month, while eAgora earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$103.56M more per month for Threads). Annual revenue: Threads ≈ $1.24B/year, eAgora ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Threads or eAgora? v
Threads leads with about 327.8M estimated downloads vs 395K for eAgora - a 830.1× gap. Threads's App Store downloads are estimated from 1.9M ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. eAgora reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Threads and eAgora in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
No - Threads is in Social Networking and eAgora is in Social. They share screen-time attention but earn money in different niches: Threads from social networking monetization patterns, eAgora from social.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Threads and eAgora offer? v
Threads: IAP range 3 tiers detected. eAgora: no IAP detected on the public listing. Threads runs a "Subscription (~$21.99/mo)" monetization model; eAgora runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Threads or eAgora? v
Threads edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.6 stars). Rating volume: Threads 1.9M ratings, eAgora 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Threads vs eAgora revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $103.56M for Threads and $0 for eAgora are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Social Networking / Social) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Threads or eAgora to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.