Timeshifter vs Translator X: Text Voice Photo
Timeshifter
Timeshifter Inc.
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 204K installs
VS
Translator X: Text Voice Photo
SkyPaw Co., Limited
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 39K installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
Timeshifter wins
+429% vs other
MAU winner
Timeshifter wins
+538% vs other
Rating winner
Timeshifter wins
+7% vs other
Why Timeshifter is winning
Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Bigger install base. Timeshifter has ~204K lifetime installs vs Translator X: Text Voice Photo's ~39K - 5.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Timeshifter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Timeshifter
vs
Translator X: Text Voice Photo
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
204K
◀
39K
Monthly active users (est.)?
37K
◀
6K
App Store rating
4.67★
◀
4.37★
Total ratings
3K
◀
770
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 20, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 14, 2026
- File size
- 63.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.5.0
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Travel
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 7, 2018
- Last updated
- Aug 20, 2024
- File size
- 35.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 4.5.0
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +6 more
Timeshifter trajectory
Translator X: Text Voice Photo trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Timeshifter or Translator X: Text Voice Photo? v
Translator X: Text Voice Photo earns about $0 per month, while Timeshifter earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Timeshifter ≈ $0/year, Translator X: Text Voice Photo ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Timeshifter or Translator X: Text Voice Photo? v
Timeshifter leads with about 204K estimated downloads vs 39K for Translator X: Text Voice Photo - a 5.3× gap. Timeshifter's App Store downloads are estimated from 3K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Translator X: Text Voice Photo's App Store downloads are estimated from 770 ratings.
Are Timeshifter and Translator X: Text Voice Photo in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Timeshifter and Translator X: Text Voice Photo have in-app purchases? v
Timeshifter does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Translator X: Text Voice Photo does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Timeshifter runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Translator X: Text Voice Photo runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Timeshifter or Translator X: Text Voice Photo? v
Timeshifter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Timeshifter 3K ratings, Translator X: Text Voice Photo 770 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Timeshifter vs Translator X: Text Voice Photo revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Timeshifter and $0 for Translator X: Text Voice Photo are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Timeshifter or Translator X: Text Voice Photo to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.