Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs EAT SMARTER

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Too Good To Go
App Store
$5.73M/mo
~$68.75M/yr · 75.2M installs
VS

EAT SMARTER

EatSmarter
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 834K installs
Revenue winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +572949900% vs other
Installs winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +8921% vs other
MAU winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +11148% vs other
Rating winner Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins +41% vs other

Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 5729499× more per month than EAT SMARTER - $5.73M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a $10.00/mo subscription that compounds; EAT SMARTER relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.2M lifetime installs vs EAT SMARTER's ~834K - 90.2× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste sits at 4.93★ vs 3.50★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
vs
EAT SMARTER
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.73M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$68.75M
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
75.2M
◀
834K
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.6M
◀
68K
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
3.50★
Total ratings
502K
◀
4K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.00
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste

Too Good To Go
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 8, 2015
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
141.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
26.5.0
Languages
EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
View full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report →

EAT SMARTER

EatSmarter
Google Play
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Apr 4, 2011
Last updated
Apr 16, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
3.6.22
Languages
-
View full EAT SMARTER report →

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

EAT SMARTER trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Too Good To Go: End Food Waste App Store page →EAT SMARTER Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Fussy Toddler Recipes iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSToo Good to Go End Food Waste iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidLove Manuela iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSDoordash Food Grocery More iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOS7 Eleven Rewards Shopping iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSMcdonald S iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or EAT SMARTER? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $5.73M per month, while EAT SMARTER earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$5.73M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $68.75M/year, EAT SMARTER ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or EAT SMARTER? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.2M estimated downloads vs 834K for EAT SMARTER - a 90.2× gap. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 502K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. EAT SMARTER reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and EAT SMARTER in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and EAT SMARTER have in-app purchases? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. EAT SMARTER does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)", EAT SMARTER runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or EAT SMARTER? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.4 stars). Rating volume: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 502K ratings, EAT SMARTER 8 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs EAT SMARTER revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.73M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and $0 for EAT SMARTER are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or EAT SMARTER to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.