Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$5.73M/mo
~$68.75M/yr · 75.2M installs
VS
Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club
Platinum Dining Club
Google Play
$28/mo
~$340/yr · 1K installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+20462396% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+5946813% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+5362741% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+493% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 204625× more per month than Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club - $5.73M vs $28.
- Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste charges $10.00/mo vs Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club's $9.31/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.2M lifetime installs vs Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club's ~1K - 59469.1× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste sits at 4.93★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
vs
Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$5.73M
◀
$28
Annual revenue (est.)
$68.75M
◀
$340
Lifetime installs (est.)
75.2M
◀
1K
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.6M
◀
141.68
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
-
Total ratings
502K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.00
◀
$9.31
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 17, 2023
- Last updated
- Oct 8, 2025
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.9
- Languages
- -
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $5.73M per month, while Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club earns about $28. That is a 204625.0× revenue gap (~$5.73M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $68.75M/year, Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club ≈ $340/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.2M estimated downloads vs 1K for Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club - a 59469.1× gap. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 502K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club reports 1,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club offer? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club: IAP range $2.99 - $28.99 per item. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)" monetization model; Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club runs "Subscription (~$9.31/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.9 stars). Rating volume: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 502K ratings, Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $5.73M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and $28 for Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Eatz 365 Platinum Dining Club to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.