Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$2.88M/mo
~$34.56M/yr · 75.6M installs
VS
Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant
Talos Studio
Google Play
$0/mo
~$5/yr · 24 installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+287975500% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+315094275% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+143480374% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+493% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 2879755× more per month than Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant - $2.88M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a $10.00/mo subscription that compounds; Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~75.6M lifetime installs vs Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant's ~24 - 3150943.8× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste sits at 4.93★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.88M
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$34.56M
◀
$5
Lifetime installs (est.)
75.6M
◀
24
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.9M
◀
2.688
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
-
Total ratings
504K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.00
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 1, 2026
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.4
- Languages
- -
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $2.88M per month, while Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$2.88M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $34.56M/year, Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant ≈ $5/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 75.6M estimated downloads vs 24 for Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant - a 3150943.8× gap. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 504K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant reports 10+ installs on Google Play.
Are Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant offer? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant: IAP range $6.99 per item. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)" monetization model; Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant runs "Free + IAP (tiers not exposed by store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.9 stars). Rating volume: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 504K ratings, Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.88M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and $0 for Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or Mimi: AI Kitchen Assistant to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
