Too Good To Go: Save Good Food vs TasteMatch: Flavor pairing

Too Good To Go: Save Good Food

Too Good To Go
App Store
$3.05M/mo
~$36.56M/yr · 80.0M installs
VS

TasteMatch: Flavor pairing

TasteMatch, Inc.
Google Play
$16/mo
~$193/yr · 727 installs
Revenue winner Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins +19041056% vs other
Installs winner Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins +11004948% vs other
MAU winner Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins +5011127% vs other
Rating winner Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins +493% vs other

Why Too Good To Go: Save Good Food is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food earns roughly 190412× more per month than TasteMatch: Flavor pairing - $3.05M vs $16.
  2. Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food charges $10.00/mo vs TasteMatch: Flavor pairing's $6.31/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food has ~80.0M lifetime installs vs TasteMatch: Flavor pairing's ~727 - 110050.5× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food sits at 4.93★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: Save Good Food report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Too Good To Go: Save Good Food
vs
TasteMatch: Flavor pairing
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.05M
◀
$16
Annual revenue (est.)
$36.56M
◀
$193
Lifetime installs (est.)
80.0M
◀
727
Monthly active users (est.)?
4.1M
◀
81.424
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
-
Total ratings
533K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.00
◀
$6.31
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Too Good To Go: Save Good Food

Too Good To Go
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Dec 8, 2015
Last updated
Jul 1, 2026
File size
196.7 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
26.6.21
Languages
EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
View full Too Good To Go: Save Good Food report →

TasteMatch: Flavor pairing

TasteMatch, Inc.
Google Play
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jul 3, 2023
Last updated
Jun 16, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.1.1
Languages
-
View full TasteMatch: Flavor pairing report →

Too Good To Go: Save Good Food trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

TasteMatch: Flavor pairing trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Related app pages

Too Good To Go: Save Good Food App Store page →TasteMatch: Flavor pairing Play Store page →

Related comparisons

Fussy Toddler Recipes iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSToo Good to Go End Food Waste iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidLove Manuela iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSDoordash Food Grocery More iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOS7 Eleven Rewards Shopping iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSMcdonald S iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food or TasteMatch: Flavor pairing? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food earns about $3.05M per month, while TasteMatch: Flavor pairing earns about $16. That is a 190411.6× revenue gap (~$3.05M more per month for Too Good To Go: Save Good Food). Annual revenue: Too Good To Go: Save Good Food ≈ $36.56M/year, TasteMatch: Flavor pairing ≈ $193/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food or TasteMatch: Flavor pairing? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food leads with about 80.0M estimated downloads vs 727 for TasteMatch: Flavor pairing - a 110050.5× gap. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food's App Store downloads are estimated from 533K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. TasteMatch: Flavor pairing reports 500+ installs on Google Play.
Are Too Good To Go: Save Good Food and TasteMatch: Flavor pairing in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Too Good To Go: Save Good Food and TasteMatch: Flavor pairing offer? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food: no IAP detected on the public listing. TasteMatch: Flavor pairing: IAP range $1.99 - $19.99 per item. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food runs a "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)" monetization model; TasteMatch: Flavor pairing runs "Subscription (~$6.31/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food or TasteMatch: Flavor pairing? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.9 stars). Rating volume: Too Good To Go: Save Good Food 533K ratings, TasteMatch: Flavor pairing 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Too Good To Go: Save Good Food vs TasteMatch: Flavor pairing revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.05M for Too Good To Go: Save Good Food and $16 for TasteMatch: Flavor pairing are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Too Good To Go: Save Good Food or TasteMatch: Flavor pairing to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.