Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
Too Good To Go
App Store
$2.89M/mo
~$34.72M/yr · 76.0M installs
VS
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator
M. Shanken Communications, Inc.
App Store
$767/mo
~$9.2K/yr · 81K installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+377122% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+94026% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+40582% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste wins
+6% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: End Food Waste is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns roughly 3772× more per month than WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator - $2.89M vs $767.
- Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste charges $10.00/mo vs WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator's $2.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste has ~76.0M lifetime installs vs WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator's ~81K - 941.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: End Food Waste report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste
vs
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$2.89M
◀
$767
Annual revenue (est.)
$34.72M
◀
$9.2K
Lifetime installs (est.)
76.0M
◀
81K
Monthly active users (est.)?
3.9M
◀
10K
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
4.64★
Total ratings
507K
◀
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.00
◀
$2.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
2 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 141.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.5.0
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 23, 2010
- Last updated
- Feb 10, 2026
- File size
- 311.8 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 6.9.3
- Languages
- English
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste trajectory
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste earns about $2.89M per month, while WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator earns about $767. That is a 3772.2× revenue gap (~$2.89M more per month for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste). Annual revenue: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste ≈ $34.72M/year, WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator ≈ $9.2K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste leads with about 76.0M estimated downloads vs 81K for WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator - a 941.3× gap. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste's App Store downloads are estimated from 507K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator offer? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste: no IAP detected on the public listing. WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Too Good To Go: End Food Waste runs a "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)" monetization model; WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator runs "Subscription (~$2.50/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator? v
Too Good To Go: End Food Waste edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Too Good To Go: End Food Waste 507K ratings, WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Too Good To Go: End Food Waste vs WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $2.89M for Too Good To Go: End Food Waste and $767 for WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Too Good To Go: End Food Waste or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.