Too Good To Go: Save Good Food vs WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food
Too Good To Go
App Store
$3.04M/mo
~$36.49M/yr · 79.8M installs
VS
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator
M. Shanken Communications, Inc.
App Store
$773/mo
~$9.3K/yr · 81K installs
Revenue winner
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins
+393241% vs other
Installs winner
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins
+98137% vs other
MAU winner
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins
+42359% vs other
Rating winner
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food wins
+6% vs other
Why Too Good To Go: Save Good Food is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Too Good To Go: Save Good Food earns roughly 3933× more per month than WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator - $3.04M vs $773.
- Premium pricing. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food charges $10.00/mo vs WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator's $2.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food has ~79.8M lifetime installs vs WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator's ~81K - 982.4× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Too Good To Go: Save Good Food report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food
vs
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$3.04M
◀
$773
Annual revenue (est.)
$36.49M
◀
$9.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
79.8M
◀
81K
Monthly active users (est.)?
4.1M
◀
10K
App Store rating
4.93★
◀
4.65★
Total ratings
532K
◀
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.00
◀
$2.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
2 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 8, 2015
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 196.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.6.20
- Languages
- EU, Catalan, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English +10 more
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 23, 2010
- Last updated
- Jun 25, 2026
- File size
- 283.7 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 6.9.4
- Languages
- English
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food trajectory
WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food earns about $3.04M per month, while WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator earns about $773. That is a 3933.4× revenue gap (~$3.04M more per month for Too Good To Go: Save Good Food). Annual revenue: Too Good To Go: Save Good Food ≈ $36.49M/year, WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator ≈ $9.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food leads with about 79.8M estimated downloads vs 81K for WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator - a 982.4× gap. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food's App Store downloads are estimated from 532K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are Too Good To Go: Save Good Food and WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Too Good To Go: Save Good Food and WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator offer? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food: no IAP detected on the public listing. WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Too Good To Go: Save Good Food runs a "Subscription (~$10.00/mo, security)" monetization model; WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator runs "Subscription (~$2.50/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Too Good To Go: Save Good Food or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator? v
Too Good To Go: Save Good Food edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Too Good To Go: Save Good Food 532K ratings, WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Too Good To Go: Save Good Food vs WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $3.04M for Too Good To Go: Save Good Food and $773 for WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Too Good To Go: Save Good Food or WineRatings+ by Wine Spectator to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.