Velo-VPN vs Voyager: AI Swift Browser

Velo-VPN

Pavankumarswamy
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 2.8M installs
VS

Voyager: AI Swift Browser

James c. Ross
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.7M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner Velo-VPN wins +62% vs other
MAU winner Velo-VPN wins +62% vs other
Rating winner Velo-VPN wins +2% vs other

Why Velo-VPN is winning

Top 1 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Bigger install base. Velo-VPN has ~2.8M lifetime installs vs Voyager: AI Swift Browser's ~1.7M - 1.6× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Velo-VPN report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Velo-VPN
vs
Voyager: AI Swift Browser
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
1.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
164K
101K
App Store rating
4.46★
4.36★
Total ratings
2K
7K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

Velo-VPN

Pavankumarswamy
Google Play
Category
Tools
Price
Free
Released
Dec 9, 2025
Last updated
Jan 28, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.0.6
Languages
-
View full Velo-VPN report →

Voyager: AI Swift Browser

James c. Ross
Google Play
Category
Tools
Price
Free
Released
Mar 15, 2025
Last updated
Apr 24, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
1.1.8
Languages
-
View full Voyager: AI Swift Browser report →

Velo-VPN trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Voyager: AI Swift Browser trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Velo-VPN or Voyager: AI Swift Browser? v
Voyager: AI Swift Browser earns about $0 per month, while Velo-VPN earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Velo-VPN ≈ $0/year, Voyager: AI Swift Browser ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Velo-VPN or Voyager: AI Swift Browser? v
Velo-VPN leads with about 2.8M estimated downloads vs 1.7M for Voyager: AI Swift Browser - a 1.6× gap. Velo-VPN reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Voyager: AI Swift Browser reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Velo-VPN and Voyager: AI Swift Browser in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Tools category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Velo-VPN and Voyager: AI Swift Browser have in-app purchases? v
Velo-VPN does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Voyager: AI Swift Browser does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Velo-VPN runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Voyager: AI Swift Browser runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Velo-VPN or Voyager: AI Swift Browser? v
Velo-VPN edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Velo-VPN 26 ratings, Voyager: AI Swift Browser 896 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Velo-VPN vs Voyager: AI Swift Browser revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Velo-VPN and $0 for Voyager: AI Swift Browser are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Tools) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Velo-VPN or Voyager: AI Swift Browser to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.