Wine Maps vs Wine-Searcher
Wine Maps
Jonathan Lord
App Store
$140/mo
~$1.7K/yr · 5K installs
VS
Wine-Searcher
Wine-Searcher Ltd
App Store
$78.9K/mo
~$946.9K/yr · 1.9M installs
Revenue winner
Wine-Searcher wins
+56264% vs other
Installs winner
Wine-Searcher wins
+35096% vs other
MAU winner
Wine-Searcher wins
+41783% vs other
Rating winner
Wine-Searcher wins
+5% vs other
Why Wine-Searcher is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Wine-Searcher earns roughly 564× more per month than Wine Maps - $78.9K vs $140.
- Aggressive pricing. Wine-Searcher undercuts at $10.99/mo vs $21.68/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Wine-Searcher has ~1.9M lifetime installs vs Wine Maps's ~5K - 352.0× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Wine-Searcher report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$140
▶
$78.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.7K
▶
$946.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
5K
▶
1.9M
Monthly active users (est.)?
530
▶
222K
App Store rating
4.58★
▶
4.81★
Total ratings
106
▶
17K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$21.68
◀
$10.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
=
1 tiers
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- USD0.99
- Released
- Aug 28, 2012
- Last updated
- Dec 16, 2024
- File size
- 48.4 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 5.2.2
- Languages
- English, French
- Category
- Food & Drink
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 25, 2013
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 139.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.15
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Spanish
Wine Maps trajectory
Wine-Searcher trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Wine Maps or Wine-Searcher? v
Wine-Searcher earns about $78.9K per month, while Wine Maps earns about $140. That is a 563.6× revenue gap (~$78.8K more per month for Wine-Searcher). Annual revenue: Wine Maps ≈ $1.7K/year, Wine-Searcher ≈ $946.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Wine Maps or Wine-Searcher? v
Wine-Searcher leads with about 1.9M estimated downloads vs 5K for Wine Maps - a 352.0× gap. Wine Maps's App Store downloads are estimated from 106 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Wine-Searcher's App Store downloads are estimated from 17K ratings.
Are Wine Maps and Wine-Searcher in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Wine Maps and Wine-Searcher offer? v
Wine Maps: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Wine-Searcher: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Wine Maps runs a "Paid app ($0.99)" monetization model; Wine-Searcher runs "Subscription (~$10.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Wine Maps or Wine-Searcher? v
Wine-Searcher edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Wine Maps 106 ratings, Wine-Searcher 17K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Wine Maps vs Wine-Searcher revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $140 for Wine Maps and $78.9K for Wine-Searcher are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Wine Maps or Wine-Searcher to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
