tado° vs Xiaomi Home
tado°
tado°
App Store
$440/mo
~$5.3K/yr · 39K installs
VS
Xiaomi Home
Beijing Xiaomi Co., Ltd
App Store
$5.1K/mo
~$61.1K/yr · 724K installs
Revenue winner
Xiaomi Home wins
+1057% vs other
Installs winner
Xiaomi Home wins
+1755% vs other
MAU winner
Xiaomi Home wins
+1628% vs other
Rating winner
tado° wins
+24% vs other
Why Xiaomi Home is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Xiaomi Home earns roughly 12× more per month than tado° - $5.1K vs $440.
- Aggressive pricing. Xiaomi Home undercuts at $1.99/mo vs $2.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Xiaomi Home has ~724K lifetime installs vs tado°'s ~39K - 18.5× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Xiaomi Home runs 6 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Xiaomi Home report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
tado°
vs
Xiaomi Home
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$440
▶
$5.1K
Annual revenue (est.)
$5.3K
▶
$61.1K
Lifetime installs (est.)
39K
▶
724K
Monthly active users (est.)?
5K
▶
79K
App Store rating
4.51★
◀
3.64★
Total ratings
781
▶
9K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.99
◀
$1.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
▶
6 tiers
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 12, 2013
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- 115.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 9.29
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Spanish
- Category
- Lifestyle
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 27, 2015
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 674.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 11.4.202
- Languages
- Arabic, Czech, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +22 more
tado° trajectory
Xiaomi Home trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, tado° or Xiaomi Home? v
Xiaomi Home earns about $5.1K per month, while tado° earns about $440. That is a 11.6× revenue gap (~$4.6K more per month for Xiaomi Home). Annual revenue: tado° ≈ $5.3K/year, Xiaomi Home ≈ $61.1K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, tado° or Xiaomi Home? v
Xiaomi Home leads with about 724K estimated downloads vs 39K for tado° - a 18.5× gap. tado°'s App Store downloads are estimated from 781 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Xiaomi Home's App Store downloads are estimated from 9K ratings.
Are tado° and Xiaomi Home in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Lifestyle category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do tado° and Xiaomi Home offer? v
tado°: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Xiaomi Home: IAP range 6 tiers detected. tado° runs a "Subscription (~$2.99/mo)" monetization model; Xiaomi Home runs "Subscription (~$1.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, tado° or Xiaomi Home? v
tado° edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 3.6 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: tado° 781 ratings, Xiaomi Home 9K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these tado° vs Xiaomi Home revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $440 for tado° and $5.1K for Xiaomi Home are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Lifestyle) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare tado° or Xiaomi Home to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.