Review Insights · Google Play
Journable: AI Calorie Counter
Journable · 97,963 ratings · ★ 4.7
4.7
★★★★★
97,963 ratings
🎯 Build a better version
Top complaints - extracted from 9 negative reviews
Recurring phrases mined from 1-2★ reviews. The bigger the percentage, the more users have the same problem. Fix the top 2-3 in your version and you have product-market fit on day one.
1
"macros"
3 negative reviews mention this · 33% of all complaints
★★★★★ "it was good. but the new update in u.i. is soo stupid. i could see my calroies at macros togather but now I need to slide. it's really annoying." - Varun Shrivastav
📋 All 9 negative reviews
Every 1-2★ review we fetched. Use the copy button to grab them all for your own analysis (paste into ChatGPT/Claude with a prompt like "summarize core user problems, group by theme, ignore bugs, focus on missing features").
it was good. but the new update in u.i. is soo stupid. i could see my calroies at macros togather but now I need to slide. it's really annoying.
so bad in start it tells it is free then it require money i am so angry
detects baigan varta when i snap beef photo
It has a good interface. However, their business tactics felt underhanded. They did not clarify that initial app usage is a trial run.
ig its wrong sometimes like macros
have to pay, which sucks...
bro it called Greek yogurt "mayonnaise"
edited to one star. The problem is known since at least Jan 26 and not fixed: added product information of vegetables via a Foto. journable extracted correctly the macros. journable set weight to 150g according to serving recommendations of product packaging. I manually adapted to 300g and also tried adapting to 400g. the macros of the vegetables skyrocketed from 68kcal for 150g to 1000kcal for 400g. The same behaviour was observable when setting to 300g. repeated the procedure multiple times.
It is okay. Not very Indian cuisine friendly. And miscalculates portions.
Sentiment summary
94%
Positive (4-5★)
3%
Neutral (3★)
3%
Negative (1-2★)