Review Insights · Google Play
Splitser - WieBetaaltWat
Splitser B.V. · 5,521 ratings · ★ 4.7
4.7
★★★★★
5,521 ratings
🎯 Build a better version
Top complaints - extracted from 11 negative reviews
Recurring phrases mined from 1-2★ reviews. The bigger the percentage, the more users have the same problem. Fix the top 2-3 in your version and you have product-market fit on day one.
1
"confusing"
3 negative reviews mention this · 27% of all complaints
★★★★★ "Confusing language between personal and global functions leads to premature settlement" - Robin Verdegaal
📋 All 11 negative reviews
Every 1-2★ review we fetched. Use the copy button to grab them all for your own analysis (paste into ChatGPT/Claude with a prompt like "summarize core user problems, group by theme, ignore bugs, focus on missing features").
it was a good app but now not working
Many bugs with adding a transaction lately. Not possible to select members a lot of times.
App is nice, but misses scheduled expenses. What's a no go are the constant pop-ups for the payments. Edit: Sending promotional notifications on the same channel as notifications for new entries is just annoying... Regarding the"we only send it once a year": Just got another notification not even a month after the first. So that was a lie.
spamming notifcations
added ads in the last update, looking for alternative now
If you do settlement by mistake, cannot undo. Unexpected fee.
The fundamentals are solid (great expense creation screen, recurring expenses, etc) but I see no improvement on some of the bad decisions that have been made. Notably, the annoying Revolut ads on the home screen even though Revolut isn't even available in my country, and the over-reliance on in-app bank transfers to settle debts, when again, they aren't available in my country. In other words, this app is really designed for the European market where it was developed, and not for elsewhere.
Heeft nu ineens (zeer afleidende) reclames. wij zijn overgegaan naar Splid.
Confusing language between personal and global functions leads to premature settlement
Balance Settlements is confusing, need to make it more simple. Need direct balance settlements to payer. Here it is going into indirect payers
Dates use the stupid American format. It's confusing. Money apps shouldn't be confusing.
Sentiment summary
92%
Positive (4-5★)
5%
Neutral (3★)
3%
Negative (1-2★)
