99: Rides, Food, Pay vs been

been earns about $5.7K per month, while 99: Rides, Food, Pay earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$5.7K more per month for been). Annual revenue: 99: Rides, Food, Pay ≈ $0/year, been ≈ $67.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.

99: Rides, Food, Pay leads with about 1.8M estimated downloads vs 577K for been - a 3.2× gap. 99: Rides, Food, Pay's App Store downloads are estimated from 17K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. been's App Store downloads are estimated from 7K ratings.

Yes - both apps sit in the Travel category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.

99: Rides, Food, Pay: no IAP detected on the public listing. been: IAP range 3 tiers detected. 99: Rides, Food, Pay runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; been runs "Subscription (~$1.67/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.

99: Rides, Food, Pay edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: 99: Rides, Food, Pay 17K ratings, been 7K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.

Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for 99: Rides, Food, Pay and $5.7K for been are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Travel) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.

Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.