adidas Running: Run tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit)
adidas Running: Run tracker
adidas
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 96.5M installs
VS
Google Health (Fitbit)
Google LLC
Google Play
$5.75M/mo
~$68.98M/yr · 268.8M installs
Revenue winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+574863800% vs other
Installs winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+178% vs other
MAU winner
Google Health (Fitbit) wins
+23% vs other
Rating winner
adidas Running: Run tracker wins
+23% vs other
Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 5748638× more per month than adidas Running: Run tracker - $5.75M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Google Health (Fitbit) runs a $28.27/mo subscription that compounds; adidas Running: Run tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~268.8M lifetime installs vs adidas Running: Run tracker's ~96.5M - 2.8× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
adidas Running: Run tracker
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$5.75M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$68.98M
Lifetime installs (est.)
96.5M
▶
268.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.4M
▶
9.1M
App Store rating
4.63★
◀
3.77★
Total ratings
1.7M
◀
1.3M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$28.27
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 12, 2010
- Last updated
- Jun 2, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
adidas Running: Run tracker trajectory
Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, adidas Running: Run tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.75M per month, while adidas Running: Run tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$5.75M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: adidas Running: Run tracker ≈ $0/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.98M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, adidas Running: Run tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 268.8M estimated downloads vs 96.5M for adidas Running: Run tracker - a 2.8× gap. adidas Running: Run tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are adidas Running: Run tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do adidas Running: Run tracker and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
adidas Running: Run tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. adidas Running: Run tracker runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, adidas Running: Run tracker or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
adidas Running: Run tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 0.9 stars). Rating volume: adidas Running: Run tracker 25K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 250K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these adidas Running: Run tracker vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for adidas Running: Run tracker and $5.75M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare adidas Running: Run tracker or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.