adidas Running: Run tracker vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

adidas Running: Run tracker

adidas
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 96.5M installs
VS

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

MacrosFirst, Inc.
Google Play
$50.9K/mo
~$610.3K/yr · 329K installs
Revenue winner MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins +5085900% vs other
Installs winner adidas Running: Run tracker wins +29229% vs other
MAU winner adidas Running: Run tracker wins +10307% vs other
Rating winner MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker wins +2% vs other

Why MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker is winning

Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns roughly 50859× more per month than adidas Running: Run tracker - $50.9K vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs a $23.65/mo subscription that compounds; adidas Running: Run tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

adidas Running: Run tracker
vs
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
$50.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
$610.3K
Lifetime installs (est.)
96.5M
329K
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.4M
71K
App Store rating
4.63★
4.72★
Total ratings
1.7M
5K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
$23.65
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers

adidas Running: Run tracker

adidas
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
May 12, 2010
Last updated
Jun 2, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full adidas Running: Run tracker report →

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker

MacrosFirst, Inc.
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Jul 14, 2017
Last updated
Jun 26, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
2.1.679
Languages
-
View full MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker report →

adidas Running: Run tracker trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, adidas Running: Run tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker earns about $50.9K per month, while adidas Running: Run tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$50.9K more per month for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker). Annual revenue: adidas Running: Run tracker ≈ $0/year, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker ≈ $610.3K/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, adidas Running: Run tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
adidas Running: Run tracker leads with about 96.5M estimated downloads vs 329K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker - a 293.3× gap. adidas Running: Run tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are adidas Running: Run tracker and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do adidas Running: Run tracker and MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker offer? v
adidas Running: Run tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $79.99 per item. adidas Running: Run tracker runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$23.65/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, adidas Running: Run tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker? v
MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: adidas Running: Run tracker 25K ratings, MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker 527 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these adidas Running: Run tracker vs MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for adidas Running: Run tracker and $50.9K for MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare adidas Running: Run tracker or MacrosFirst - Macro Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.