AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio
YAZIO
App Store
$284.6K/mo
~$3.41M/yr · 1.7M installs
VS
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Yuka App
Google Play
$1.84M/mo
~$22.07M/yr · 41.7M installs
Revenue winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+546% vs other
Installs winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+2346% vs other
MAU winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+552% vs other
Rating winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+1% vs other
Why Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns roughly 6× more per month than AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio - $1.84M vs $284.6K.
- Premium pricing. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner charges $14.14/mo vs AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio's $11.90/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner has ~41.7M lifetime installs vs AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio's ~1.7M - 24.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio
vs
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$284.6K
▶
$1.84M
Annual revenue (est.)
$3.41M
▶
$22.07M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.7M
▶
41.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
493K
▶
3.2M
App Store rating
4.70★
▶
4.72★
Total ratings
49K
▶
183K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.90
▶
$14.14
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 6, 2015
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- 348.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 26.26.3
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +14 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 2, 2019
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.60.1
- Languages
- -
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio trajectory
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns about $1.84M per month, while AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio earns about $284.6K. That is a 6.5× revenue gap (~$1.55M more per month for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner). Annual revenue: AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio ≈ $3.41M/year, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner ≈ $22.07M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner leads with about 41.7M estimated downloads vs 1.7M for AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio - a 24.5× gap. AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio's App Store downloads are estimated from 49K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner offer? v
AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner: IAP range $10.00 - $20.00 per item. AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio runs a "Subscription (~$11.90/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs "Subscription (~$14.14/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio 49K ratings, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner 10K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $284.6K for AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio and $1.84M for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AI Calorie Tracker by Yazio or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.