AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI
HEYOS
Google Play
$9.8K/mo
~$117.9K/yr · 61K installs
VS
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Fig - Food Is Good
Google Play
$85.6K/mo
~$1.03M/yr · 790K installs
Revenue winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+771% vs other
Installs winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+1195% vs other
MAU winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+769% vs other
Rating winner
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide wins
+2% vs other
Why Fig: Food Scanner & Guide is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fig: Food Scanner & Guide earns roughly 9× more per month than AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI - $85.6K vs $9.8K.
- Premium pricing. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide charges $19.57/mo vs AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI's $14.13/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide has ~790K lifetime installs vs AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI's ~61K - 12.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fig: Food Scanner & Guide report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI
vs
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$9.8K
▶
$85.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$117.9K
▶
$1.03M
Lifetime installs (est.)
61K
▶
790K
Monthly active users (est.)?
17K
▶
150K
App Store rating
4.39★
▶
4.49★
Total ratings
1K
▶
7K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$14.13
▶
$19.57
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 25, 2024
- Last updated
- Apr 28, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.8.6
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 30, 2021
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 4.148.2
- Languages
- -
AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI trajectory
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide earns about $85.6K per month, while AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI earns about $9.8K. That is a 8.7× revenue gap (~$75.8K more per month for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide). Annual revenue: AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI ≈ $117.9K/year, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide ≈ $1.03M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide leads with about 790K estimated downloads vs 61K for AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI - a 12.9× gap. AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI reports 50,000+ installs on Google Play. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide reports 500,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI and Fig: Food Scanner & Guide in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI and Fig: Food Scanner & Guide offer? v
AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI: IAP range $4.99 - $39.99 per item. Fig: Food Scanner & Guide: IAP range $4.79 - $79.99 per item. AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI runs a "Subscription (~$14.13/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fig: Food Scanner & Guide runs "Subscription (~$19.57/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide? v
Fig: Food Scanner & Guide edges ahead with ★ 4.5 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI 14 ratings, Fig: Food Scanner & Guide 2K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI vs Fig: Food Scanner & Guide revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $9.8K for AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI and $85.6K for Fig: Food Scanner & Guide are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare AI Calorie Tracker - Fit AI or Fig: Food Scanner & Guide to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.