Airbrush: Face Photo Editor vs Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
Airbrush: Face Photo Editor
PIXOCIAL TECHNOLOGY (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
App Store
$1.61M/mo
~$19.31M/yr · 29.9M installs
VS
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
$1.64M/mo
~$19.64M/yr · 16.4M installs
Revenue winner
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera wins
+2% vs other
Installs winner
Airbrush: Face Photo Editor wins
+82% vs other
MAU winner
Airbrush: Face Photo Editor wins
+82% vs other
Rating winner
Airbrush: Face Photo Editor wins
+1% vs other
Why Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Premium pricing. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera charges $12.99/mo vs Airbrush: Face Photo Editor's $6.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- More monetization surfaces. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs 10 IAP tiers vs 7 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Airbrush: Face Photo Editor
vs
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.61M
▶
$1.64M
Annual revenue (est.)
$19.31M
▶
$19.64M
Lifetime installs (est.)
29.9M
◀
16.4M
Monthly active users (est.)?
7.1M
◀
3.9M
App Store rating
4.80★
◀
4.75★
Total ratings
199K
◀
109K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
▶
$12.99
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 8, 2015
- Last updated
- Jun 20, 2026
- File size
- 605.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 8.11.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Portuguese, Russian +3 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 17, 2018
- Last updated
- Jun 8, 2026
- File size
- 138.9 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.17.3
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +8 more
Airbrush: Face Photo Editor trajectory
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Airbrush: Face Photo Editor or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera? v
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns about $1.64M per month, while Airbrush: Face Photo Editor earns about $1.61M. That is a 1.0× revenue gap (~$27.1K more per month for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera). Annual revenue: Airbrush: Face Photo Editor ≈ $19.31M/year, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera ≈ $19.64M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Airbrush: Face Photo Editor or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera? v
Airbrush: Face Photo Editor leads with about 29.9M estimated downloads vs 16.4M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera - a 1.8× gap. Airbrush: Face Photo Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 199K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 109K ratings.
Are Airbrush: Face Photo Editor and Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Airbrush: Face Photo Editor and Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera offer? v
Airbrush: Face Photo Editor: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Airbrush: Face Photo Editor runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Airbrush: Face Photo Editor or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera? v
Airbrush: Face Photo Editor edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Airbrush: Face Photo Editor 199K ratings, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera 109K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Airbrush: Face Photo Editor vs Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.61M for Airbrush: Face Photo Editor and $1.64M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Airbrush: Face Photo Editor or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.