Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla vs Club·by - Foster's Hollywood

Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla

Anmol Rattan
App Store
$237/mo
~$2.8K/yr · 2K installs
VS

Club·by - Foster's Hollywood

Foster's Hollywood
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 3.5M installs
Revenue winner Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla wins +23700% vs other
Installs winner Club·by - Foster's Hollywood wins +167857% vs other
MAU winner Club·by - Foster's Hollywood wins +80290% vs other
Rating winner Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla wins +14% vs other

Why Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla earns roughly 237× more per month than Club·by - Foster's Hollywood - $237 vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla runs a $29.99/mo subscription that compounds; Club·by - Foster's Hollywood relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. More monetization surfaces. Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
  4. Better app store reviews. Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla sits at 4.58★ vs 4.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla
vs
Club·by - Foster's Hollywood
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$237
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.8K
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
3.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
244.53
197K
App Store rating
4.58★
4.00★
Total ratings
38
36K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$29.99
No sub
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
0 tiers

Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla

Anmol Rattan
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Aug 14, 2025
Last updated
Apr 4, 2026
File size
29.8 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
1.1.3
Languages
English
View full Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla report →

Club·by - Foster's Hollywood

Foster's Hollywood
Google Play
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
-
Last updated
May 11, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
5.0.37
Languages
-
View full Club·by - Foster's Hollywood report →

Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

Club·by - Foster's Hollywood trajectory

AugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJul

FAQ

Which makes more money, Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or Club·by - Foster's Hollywood? v
Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla earns about $237 per month, while Club·by - Foster's Hollywood earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$237 more per month for Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla). Annual revenue: Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla ≈ $2.8K/year, Club·by - Foster's Hollywood ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or Club·by - Foster's Hollywood? v
Club·by - Foster's Hollywood leads with about 3.5M estimated downloads vs 2K for Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla - a 1679.6× gap. Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla's App Store downloads are estimated from 38 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Club·by - Foster's Hollywood reports 1,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla and Club·by - Foster's Hollywood in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla and Club·by - Foster's Hollywood offer? v
Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Club·by - Foster's Hollywood: no IAP detected on the public listing. Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla runs a "Subscription (~$29.99/mo)" monetization model; Club·by - Foster's Hollywood runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or Club·by - Foster's Hollywood? v
Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.0 (gap of 0.6 stars). Rating volume: Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla 38 ratings, Club·by - Foster's Hollywood 15 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla vs Club·by - Foster's Hollywood revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $237 for Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla and $0 for Club·by - Foster's Hollywood are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or Club·by - Foster's Hollywood to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.