Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla vs TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs

Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla

Anmol Rattan
App Store
$132/mo
~$1.6K/yr · 2K installs
VS

TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs

Treat App
App Store
$967.6K/mo
~$11.61M/yr · 5.2M installs
Revenue winner TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins +732938% vs other
Installs winner TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins +279924% vs other
MAU winner TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins +287104% vs other
Rating winner TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs wins +8% vs other

Why TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs earns roughly 7330× more per month than Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla - $967.6K vs $132.
  2. Premium pricing. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs charges $47.75/mo vs Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla's $17.34/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs has ~5.2M lifetime installs vs Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla's ~2K - 2800.2× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs runs 10 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla
vs
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$132
▶
$967.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.6K
▶
$11.61M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2K
▶
5.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
218.79
▶
628K
App Store rating
4.53★
▶
4.89★
Total ratings
34
▶
48K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$17.34
▶
$47.75
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
10 tiers

Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla

Anmol Rattan
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Aug 14, 2025
Last updated
Apr 4, 2026
File size
29.8 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
1.1.3
Languages
English
View full Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla report →

TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs

Treat App
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jun 15, 2022
Last updated
Apr 12, 2026
File size
267.1 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
20.6.1
Languages
English, Russian
View full TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs report →

Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla App Store page →TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs App Store page →

Related comparisons

Allergy Food Scanner Ryla iOS vs Fussy Toddler Recipes iOSAllergy Food Scanner Ryla iOS vs Seed Oil Scout Healthy Dining iOSAllergy Food Scanner Ryla iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidAllergy Food Scanner Ryla iOS vs Love Manuela iOSAllergy Food Scanner Ryla iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSAllergy Food Scanner Ryla iOS vs Doordash Food Grocery More iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs earns about $967.6K per month, while Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla earns about $132. That is a 7330.4× revenue gap (~$967.5K more per month for TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs). Annual revenue: Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla ≈ $1.6K/year, TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs ≈ $11.61M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs leads with about 5.2M estimated downloads vs 2K for Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla - a 2800.2× gap. Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla's App Store downloads are estimated from 34 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs's App Store downloads are estimated from 48K ratings.
Are Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla and TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla and TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs offer? v
Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla: no IAP detected on the public listing. TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs: IAP range 10 tiers detected. Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla runs a "Subscription (~$17.34/mo)" monetization model; TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs runs "Subscription (~$47.75/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs? v
TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla 34 ratings, TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs 48K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla vs TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $132 for Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla and $967.6K for TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Allergy & Food Scanner: Ryla or TREAT: Play & impact REAL dogs to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.