Baby Feeding Log vs Huckleberry: Baby Tracker
Baby Feeding Log
Aron Beaver
App Store
$16.3K/mo
~$196.2K/yr · 231K installs
VS
Huckleberry: Baby Tracker
Huckleberry Labs Inc.
App Store
$760.3K/mo
~$9.12M/yr · 7.5M installs
Revenue winner
Huckleberry: Baby Tracker wins
+4551% vs other
Installs winner
Huckleberry: Baby Tracker wins
+3142% vs other
MAU winner
Huckleberry: Baby Tracker wins
+3744% vs other
Rating winner
Huckleberry: Baby Tracker wins
+2% vs other
Why Huckleberry: Baby Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Huckleberry: Baby Tracker earns roughly 47× more per month than Baby Feeding Log - $760.3K vs $16.3K.
- Subscription model. Huckleberry: Baby Tracker runs a $19.99/mo subscription that compounds; Baby Feeding Log relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Huckleberry: Baby Tracker has ~7.5M lifetime installs vs Baby Feeding Log's ~231K - 32.4× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Huckleberry: Baby Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Huckleberry: Baby Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Baby Feeding Log
vs
Huckleberry: Baby Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$16.3K
▶
$760.3K
Annual revenue (est.)
$196.2K
▶
$9.12M
Lifetime installs (est.)
231K
▶
7.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
51K
▶
2.0M
App Store rating
4.82★
▶
4.92★
Total ratings
3K
▶
68K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
▶
4 tiers
- Category
- Medical
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 1, 2011
- Last updated
- Jul 25, 2024
- File size
- 7.0 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.716
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese +3 more
- Category
- Medical
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jul 4, 2017
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 204.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- v0.9.299
- Languages
- English
Baby Feeding Log trajectory
Huckleberry: Baby Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Baby Feeding Log or Huckleberry: Baby Tracker? v
Huckleberry: Baby Tracker earns about $760.3K per month, while Baby Feeding Log earns about $16.3K. That is a 46.5× revenue gap (~$744.0K more per month for Huckleberry: Baby Tracker). Annual revenue: Baby Feeding Log ≈ $196.2K/year, Huckleberry: Baby Tracker ≈ $9.12M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Baby Feeding Log or Huckleberry: Baby Tracker? v
Huckleberry: Baby Tracker leads with about 7.5M estimated downloads vs 231K for Baby Feeding Log - a 32.4× gap. Baby Feeding Log's App Store downloads are estimated from 3K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Huckleberry: Baby Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 68K ratings.
Are Baby Feeding Log and Huckleberry: Baby Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Medical category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Baby Feeding Log and Huckleberry: Baby Tracker offer? v
Baby Feeding Log: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Huckleberry: Baby Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Baby Feeding Log runs a "Free + one-time IAP (1 tiers)" monetization model; Huckleberry: Baby Tracker runs "Subscription (~$11.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Baby Feeding Log or Huckleberry: Baby Tracker? v
Huckleberry: Baby Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Baby Feeding Log 3K ratings, Huckleberry: Baby Tracker 68K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Baby Feeding Log vs Huckleberry: Baby Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $16.3K for Baby Feeding Log and $760.3K for Huckleberry: Baby Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Medical) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Baby Feeding Log or Huckleberry: Baby Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.