BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor vs Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor
PIXOCIAL TECHNOLOGY (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD.
App Store
$1.86M/mo
~$22.33M/yr · 51.7M installs
VS
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
DAZZ PTE. LTD.
App Store
$1.60M/mo
~$19.15M/yr · 16.0M installs
Revenue winner
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor wins
+17% vs other
Installs winner
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor wins
+224% vs other
MAU winner
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor wins
+116% vs other
Rating winner
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor wins
+1% vs other
Why BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor is winning
Top 2 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Aggressive pricing. BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor undercuts at $6.99/mo vs $12.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor has ~51.7M lifetime installs vs Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's ~16.0M - 3.2× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor
vs
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$1.86M
◀
$1.60M
Annual revenue (est.)
$22.33M
◀
$19.15M
Lifetime installs (est.)
51.7M
◀
16.0M
Monthly active users (est.)?
8.2M
◀
3.8M
App Store rating
4.82★
◀
4.75★
Total ratings
345K
◀
107K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
▶
$12.99
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
▶
10 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 25, 2013
- Last updated
- Apr 30, 2026
- File size
- 657.5 MB
- Content rating
- 9+
- Version
- 7.37.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Italian +10 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 17, 2018
- Last updated
- May 7, 2026
- File size
- 138.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.17.1
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean +8 more
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor trajectory
Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera? v
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor earns about $1.86M per month, while Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera earns about $1.60M. That is a 1.2× revenue gap (~$264.8K more per month for BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor). Annual revenue: BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor ≈ $22.33M/year, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera ≈ $19.15M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera? v
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor leads with about 51.7M estimated downloads vs 16.0M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera - a 3.2× gap. BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor's App Store downloads are estimated from 345K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera's App Store downloads are estimated from 107K ratings.
Are BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor and Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor and Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera offer? v
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera: IAP range 10 tiers detected. BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera runs "Subscription (~$12.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera? v
BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor 345K ratings, Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera 107K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor vs Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $1.86M for BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor and $1.60M for Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BeautyPlus-Selfie Photo Editor or Dazz Cam - Vintage Camera to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.