BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
Reface Lithuania UAB
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 4.7M installs
VS
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Strava Inc.
Google Play
$3.74M/mo
~$44.90M/yr · 121.8M installs
Revenue winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+374142600% vs other
Installs winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+2486% vs other
MAU winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+303% vs other
Rating winner
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker wins
+2% vs other
Why Strava: Run, Bike, Walk is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Strava: Run, Bike, Walk earns roughly 3741426× more per month than BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - $3.74M vs $0.
- Subscription model. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk runs a $27.34/mo subscription that compounds; BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk has ~121.8M lifetime installs vs BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's ~4.7M - 25.9× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Strava: Run, Bike, Walk report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker
vs
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$3.74M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$44.90M
Lifetime installs (est.)
4.7M
▶
121.8M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.2M
▶
4.9M
App Store rating
4.66★
◀
4.59★
Total ratings
43K
▶
1.1M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$27.34
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 10, 2024
- Last updated
- May 1, 2026
- File size
- 161.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.13.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 9, 2011
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker trajectory
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk earns about $3.74M per month, while BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$3.74M more per month for Strava: Run, Bike, Walk). Annual revenue: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker ≈ $0/year, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk ≈ $44.90M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk leads with about 121.8M estimated downloads vs 4.7M for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker - a 25.9× gap. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 43K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk offer? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk: IAP range $2.99 - $249.99 per item. BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; Strava: Run, Bike, Walk runs "Subscription (~$27.34/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk? v
BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker 43K ratings, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk 34K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker vs Strava: Run, Bike, Walk revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker and $3.74M for Strava: Run, Bike, Walk are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare BitePal: Food Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.