Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Next Vision Limited
App Store
$35.3K/mo
~$423.5K/yr · 631K installs
VS
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Google LLC
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 356.3M installs
Revenue winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+3529400% vs other
Installs winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+56403% vs other
MAU winner
Google Fit: Activity Tracking wins
+6352% vs other
Rating winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+36% vs other
Why Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter earns roughly 35294× more per month than Google Fit: Activity Tracking - $35.3K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter runs a $3.99/mo subscription that compounds; Google Fit: Activity Tracking relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Better app store reviews. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter sits at 4.70★ vs 3.45★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
vs
Google Fit: Activity Tracking
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$35.3K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$423.5K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
631K
▶
356.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
182K
▶
11.8M
App Store rating
4.70★
◀
3.45★
Total ratings
18K
▶
682K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 11, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- File size
- 220.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.68
- Languages
- Arabic, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +14 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Oct 28, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 15, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter trajectory
Google Fit: Activity Tracking trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter earns about $35.3K per month, while Google Fit: Activity Tracking earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$35.3K more per month for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter ≈ $423.5K/year, Google Fit: Activity Tracking ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Google Fit: Activity Tracking leads with about 356.3M estimated downloads vs 631K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter - a 565.0× gap. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 18K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Fit: Activity Tracking reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter and Google Fit: Activity Tracking in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter and Google Fit: Activity Tracking offer? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Google Fit: Activity Tracking: no IAP detected on the public listing. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$3.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Google Fit: Activity Tracking runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 3.5 (gap of 1.2 stars). Rating volume: Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter 18K ratings, Google Fit: Activity Tracking 30K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter vs Google Fit: Activity Tracking revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $35.3K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter and $0 for Google Fit: Activity Tracking are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or Google Fit: Activity Tracking to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.