Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter vs InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
Next Vision Limited
App Store
$35.2K/mo
~$421.9K/yr · 628K installs
VS
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor
AIBY
App Store
$960.6K/mo
~$11.53M/yr · 26.5M installs
Revenue winner
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor wins
+2632% vs other
Installs winner
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor wins
+4113% vs other
MAU winner
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor wins
+2714% vs other
Rating winner
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter wins
+1% vs other
Why InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor earns roughly 27× more per month than Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter - $960.6K vs $35.2K.
- Premium pricing. InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor charges $5.83/mo vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter's $3.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor has ~26.5M lifetime installs vs Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter's ~628K - 42.1× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor runs 4 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter
vs
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$35.2K
▶
$960.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$421.9K
▶
$11.53M
Lifetime installs (est.)
628K
▶
26.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
182K
▶
5.1M
App Store rating
4.70★
◀
4.64★
Total ratings
18K
▶
176K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$3.99
▶
$5.83
IAP tiers detected
1 tiers
▶
4 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 11, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- File size
- 220.8 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.2.68
- Languages
- Arabic, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +14 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 7, 2019
- Last updated
- Oct 22, 2025
- File size
- 87.1 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 2.63
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese +7 more
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter trajectory
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor? v
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor earns about $960.6K per month, while Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter earns about $35.2K. That is a 27.3× revenue gap (~$925.4K more per month for InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor). Annual revenue: Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter ≈ $421.9K/year, InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor ≈ $11.53M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor? v
InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor leads with about 26.5M estimated downloads vs 628K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter - a 42.1× gap. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 18K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor's App Store downloads are estimated from 176K ratings.
Are Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter and InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter and InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor offer? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter: IAP range 1 tiers detected. InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter runs a "Subscription (~$3.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor? v
Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter 18K ratings, InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor 176K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter vs InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $35.2K for Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter and $960.6K for InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calo: AI Food Calorie Counter or InPulse - Heart Rate Monitor to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.