Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker vs Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker
Virtuagym
Google Play
$832.2K/mo
~$9.99M/yr · 8.8M installs
VS
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Strava Inc.
Google Play
$3.88M/mo
~$46.54M/yr · 126.2M installs
Revenue winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+366% vs other
Installs winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+1328% vs other
MAU winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+302% vs other
Rating winner
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk wins
+3% vs other
Why Strava: Run, Bike, Walk is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Strava: Run, Bike, Walk earns roughly 5× more per month than Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker - $3.88M vs $832.2K.
- Premium pricing. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk charges $27.34/mo vs Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker's $20.48/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk has ~126.2M lifetime installs vs Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker's ~8.8M - 14.3× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Strava: Run, Bike, Walk report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker
vs
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$832.2K
▶
$3.88M
Annual revenue (est.)
$9.99M
▶
$46.54M
Lifetime installs (est.)
8.8M
▶
126.2M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.3M
▶
5.0M
App Store rating
4.47★
▶
4.59★
Total ratings
94K
▶
1.1M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$20.48
▶
$27.34
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Nov 17, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 30, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 6.1.5
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 9, 2011
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Teen
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk earns about $3.88M per month, while Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $832.2K. That is a 4.7× revenue gap (~$3.05M more per month for Strava: Run, Bike, Walk). Annual revenue: Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $9.99M/year, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk ≈ $46.54M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk leads with about 126.2M estimated downloads vs 8.8M for Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker - a 14.3× gap. Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker reports 5,000,000+ installs on Google Play. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker and Strava: Run, Bike, Walk offer? v
Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $59.99 per item. Strava: Run, Bike, Walk: IAP range $2.99 - $249.99 per item. Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$20.48/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Strava: Run, Bike, Walk runs "Subscription (~$27.34/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk? v
Strava: Run, Bike, Walk edges ahead with ★ 4.6 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker 3K ratings, Strava: Run, Bike, Walk 34K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker vs Strava: Run, Bike, Walk revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $832.2K for Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker and $3.88M for Strava: Run, Bike, Walk are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Virtuafood: AI Calorie Tracker or Strava: Run, Bike, Walk to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.