Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
fatsecret
App Store
$74.5K/mo
~$894.1K/yr · 504K installs
VS
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
Zwift, Inc
App Store
$391.5K/mo
~$4.70M/yr · 2.3M installs
Revenue winner
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness wins
+425% vs other
Installs winner
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness wins
+365% vs other
MAU winner
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness wins
+312% vs other
Rating winner
Calorie Counter by fatsecret wins
+1% vs other
Why Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness earns roughly 5× more per month than Calorie Counter by fatsecret - $391.5K vs $74.5K.
- Premium pricing. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness charges $19.99/mo vs Calorie Counter by fatsecret's $10.49/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness has ~2.3M lifetime installs vs Calorie Counter by fatsecret's ~504K - 4.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie Counter by fatsecret
vs
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$74.5K
▶
$391.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$894.1K
▶
$4.70M
Lifetime installs (est.)
504K
▶
2.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
147K
▶
605K
App Store rating
4.76★
◀
4.74★
Total ratings
14K
▶
21K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$10.49
▶
$19.99
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 23, 2009
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- 143.9 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 11.6
- Languages
- Arabic, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +17 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 10, 2016
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 3.62 GB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 1.116.2
- Languages
- English
Calorie Counter by fatsecret trajectory
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness earns about $391.5K per month, while Calorie Counter by fatsecret earns about $74.5K. That is a 5.3× revenue gap (~$317.0K more per month for Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter by fatsecret ≈ $894.1K/year, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness ≈ $4.70M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness leads with about 2.3M estimated downloads vs 504K for Calorie Counter by fatsecret - a 4.7× gap. Calorie Counter by fatsecret's App Store downloads are estimated from 14K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness's App Store downloads are estimated from 21K ratings.
Are Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter by fatsecret and Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness offer? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Calorie Counter by fatsecret runs a "Subscription (~$10.49/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness runs "Subscription (~$19.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness? v
Calorie Counter by fatsecret edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter by fatsecret 14K ratings, Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness 21K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter by fatsecret vs Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $74.5K for Calorie Counter by fatsecret and $391.5K for Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter by fatsecret or Zwift: Indoor Cycling Fitness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.