Calorie Counter & Food Tracker vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker
Municorn Limited
App Store
$56.5K/mo
~$678.2K/yr · 674K installs
VS
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Lifesum AB
App Store
$547.4K/mo
~$6.57M/yr · 6.7M installs
Revenue winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+869% vs other
Installs winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+896% vs other
MAU winner
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter wins
+893% vs other
Rating winner
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker wins
+1% vs other
Why Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter earns roughly 10× more per month than Calorie Counter & Food Tracker - $547.4K vs $56.5K.
- Aggressive pricing. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter undercuts at $5.83/mo vs $5.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter has ~6.7M lifetime installs vs Calorie Counter & Food Tracker's ~674K - 10.0× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter runs 5 IAP tiers vs 4 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker
vs
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$56.5K
▶
$547.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$678.2K
▶
$6.57M
Lifetime installs (est.)
674K
▶
6.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
195K
▶
1.9M
App Store rating
4.67★
◀
4.65★
Total ratings
19K
▶
149K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$5.99
◀
$5.83
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
▶
5 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 31, 2024
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- 176.0 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.5.1
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, NB +5 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 5, 2019
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 227.7 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 23.9.1
- Languages
- Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French +8 more
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker trajectory
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter earns about $547.4K per month, while Calorie Counter & Food Tracker earns about $56.5K. That is a 9.7× revenue gap (~$490.8K more per month for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter & Food Tracker ≈ $678.2K/year, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter ≈ $6.57M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter? v
Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter leads with about 6.7M estimated downloads vs 674K for Calorie Counter & Food Tracker - a 10.0× gap. Calorie Counter & Food Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 19K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter's App Store downloads are estimated from 149K ratings.
Are Calorie Counter & Food Tracker and Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter & Food Tracker and Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter offer? v
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Calorie Counter & Food Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter runs "Subscription (~$5.83/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter? v
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.6 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter & Food Tracker 19K ratings, Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter 149K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter & Food Tracker vs Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $56.5K for Calorie Counter & Food Tracker and $547.4K for Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or Lifesum: AI Calorie Counter to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.