Calorie Counter & Food Tracker vs MWH: Fitness + Wellness
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker
Municorn Limited
App Store
$86.3K/mo
~$1.04M/yr · 1.0M installs
VS
MWH: Fitness + Wellness
M WOOD INC
App Store
$55.6K/mo
~$666.9K/yr · 440K installs
Revenue winner
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker wins
+55% vs other
Installs winner
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker wins
+133% vs other
MAU winner
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker wins
+158% vs other
Rating winner
MWH: Fitness + Wellness wins
+4% vs other
Why Calorie Counter & Food Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calorie Counter & Food Tracker earns roughly 2× more per month than MWH: Fitness + Wellness - $86.3K vs $55.6K.
- Premium pricing. Calorie Counter & Food Tracker charges $19.99/mo vs MWH: Fitness + Wellness's $14.95/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Calorie Counter & Food Tracker has ~1.0M lifetime installs vs MWH: Fitness + Wellness's ~440K - 2.3× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Calorie Counter & Food Tracker runs 4 IAP tiers vs 1 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calorie Counter & Food Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker
vs
MWH: Fitness + Wellness
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$86.3K
◀
$55.6K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.04M
◀
$666.9K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.0M
◀
440K
Monthly active users (est.)?
298K
◀
115K
App Store rating
4.71★
▶
4.90★
Total ratings
29K
◀
5K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$19.99
◀
$14.95
IAP tiers detected
4 tiers
◀
1 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 31, 2024
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 230.4 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 1.11
- Languages
- Dutch, English, French, German, Italian, NB +5 more
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Dec 3, 2019
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 147.8 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 9.0.19
- Languages
- English
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker trajectory
MWH: Fitness + Wellness trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or MWH: Fitness + Wellness? v
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker earns about $86.3K per month, while MWH: Fitness + Wellness earns about $55.6K. That is a 1.6× revenue gap (~$30.7K more per month for Calorie Counter & Food Tracker). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter & Food Tracker ≈ $1.04M/year, MWH: Fitness + Wellness ≈ $666.9K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or MWH: Fitness + Wellness? v
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker leads with about 1.0M estimated downloads vs 440K for MWH: Fitness + Wellness - a 2.3× gap. Calorie Counter & Food Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 29K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MWH: Fitness + Wellness's App Store downloads are estimated from 5K ratings.
Are Calorie Counter & Food Tracker and MWH: Fitness + Wellness in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter & Food Tracker and MWH: Fitness + Wellness offer? v
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker: IAP range 4 tiers detected. MWH: Fitness + Wellness: IAP range 1 tiers detected. Calorie Counter & Food Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$5.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; MWH: Fitness + Wellness runs "Subscription (~$14.95/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or MWH: Fitness + Wellness? v
MWH: Fitness + Wellness edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.7 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter & Food Tracker 29K ratings, MWH: Fitness + Wellness 5K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter & Food Tracker vs MWH: Fitness + Wellness revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $86.3K for Calorie Counter & Food Tracker and $55.6K for MWH: Fitness + Wellness are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter & Food Tracker or MWH: Fitness + Wellness to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.