Calorie Counter + vs Google Health (Fitbit)

Calorie Counter +

NutraTech Ltd
App Store
$166.0K/mo
~$1.99M/yr · 2.8M installs
VS

Google Health (Fitbit)

Google LLC
Google Play
$5.71M/mo
~$68.55M/yr · 266.7M installs
Revenue winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +3341% vs other
Installs winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +9300% vs other
MAU winner Google Health (Fitbit) wins +1134% vs other
Rating winner Calorie Counter + wins +26% vs other

Why Google Health (Fitbit) is winning

Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Google Health (Fitbit) earns roughly 34× more per month than Calorie Counter + - $5.71M vs $166.0K.
  2. Premium pricing. Google Health (Fitbit) charges $28.27/mo vs Calorie Counter +'s $6.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. Google Health (Fitbit) has ~266.7M lifetime installs vs Calorie Counter +'s ~2.8M - 94.0× the funnel top.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Health (Fitbit) report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Calorie Counter +
vs
Google Health (Fitbit)
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$166.0K
$5.71M
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.99M
$68.55M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
266.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
735K
9.1M
App Store rating
4.77★
3.79★
Total ratings
26K
1.3M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
$28.27
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
0 tiers

Calorie Counter +

NutraTech Ltd
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Sep 24, 2014
Last updated
Jun 15, 2026
File size
116.2 MB
Content rating
17+
Version
12.14.0
Languages
English, Spanish
View full Calorie Counter + report →

Google Health (Fitbit)

Google LLC
Google Play
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Mar 16, 2012
Last updated
Jun 18, 2026
File size
-
Content rating
Everyone
Version
VARY
Languages
-
View full Google Health (Fitbit) report →

Calorie Counter + trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Google Health (Fitbit) trajectory

JulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

FAQ

Which makes more money, Calorie Counter + or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) earns about $5.71M per month, while Calorie Counter + earns about $166.0K. That is a 34.4× revenue gap (~$5.55M more per month for Google Health (Fitbit)). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter + ≈ $1.99M/year, Google Health (Fitbit) ≈ $68.55M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter + or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Google Health (Fitbit) leads with about 266.7M estimated downloads vs 2.8M for Calorie Counter + - a 94.0× gap. Calorie Counter +'s App Store downloads are estimated from 26K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Health (Fitbit) reports 100,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calorie Counter + and Google Health (Fitbit) in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter + and Google Health (Fitbit) offer? v
Calorie Counter +: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Google Health (Fitbit): IAP range $7.99 - $99.99 per item. Calorie Counter + runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Google Health (Fitbit) runs "Subscription (~$28.27/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter + or Google Health (Fitbit)? v
Calorie Counter + edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 3.8 (gap of 1.0 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter + 26K ratings, Google Health (Fitbit) 250K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter + vs Google Health (Fitbit) revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $166.0K for Calorie Counter + and $5.71M for Google Health (Fitbit) are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter + or Google Health (Fitbit) to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.