Calorie Counter + vs Intermittent Fasting Tracker:

Calorie Counter +

NutraTech Ltd
App Store
$165.2K/mo
~$1.98M/yr · 2.8M installs
VS

Intermittent Fasting Tracker:

Kai Oelfke
App Store
$301.4K/mo
~$3.62M/yr · 5.1M installs
Revenue winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +83% vs other
Installs winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +81% vs other
MAU winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +83% vs other
Rating winner Intermittent Fasting Tracker: wins +2% vs other

Why Intermittent Fasting Tracker: is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: earns roughly 2× more per month than Calorie Counter + - $301.4K vs $165.2K.
  2. Aggressive pricing. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: undercuts at $0.99/mo vs $6.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
  3. Bigger install base. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: has ~5.1M lifetime installs vs Calorie Counter +'s ~2.8M - 1.8× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs 8 IAP tiers vs 7 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Intermittent Fasting Tracker: report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Calorie Counter +
vs
Intermittent Fasting Tracker:
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$165.2K
$301.4K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.98M
$3.62M
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
5.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
731K
1.3M
App Store rating
4.77★
4.87★
Total ratings
26K
47K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
$0.99
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
8 tiers

Calorie Counter +

NutraTech Ltd
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
Sep 24, 2014
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
115.5 MB
Content rating
17+
Version
12.11.0
Languages
English, Spanish
View full Calorie Counter + report →

Intermittent Fasting Tracker:

Kai Oelfke
App Store
Category
Health & Fitness
Price
Free
Released
May 13, 2023
Last updated
Feb 26, 2026
File size
92.1 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
0.0.96
Languages
Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish +22 more
View full Intermittent Fasting Tracker: report →

Calorie Counter + trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Intermittent Fasting Tracker: trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

FAQ

Which makes more money, Calorie Counter + or Intermittent Fasting Tracker:? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: earns about $301.4K per month, while Calorie Counter + earns about $165.2K. That is a 1.8× revenue gap (~$136.3K more per month for Intermittent Fasting Tracker:). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter + ≈ $1.98M/year, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: ≈ $3.62M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter + or Intermittent Fasting Tracker:? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: leads with about 5.1M estimated downloads vs 2.8M for Calorie Counter + - a 1.8× gap. Calorie Counter +'s App Store downloads are estimated from 26K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Intermittent Fasting Tracker:'s App Store downloads are estimated from 47K ratings.
Are Calorie Counter + and Intermittent Fasting Tracker: in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter + and Intermittent Fasting Tracker: offer? v
Calorie Counter +: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Intermittent Fasting Tracker:: IAP range 8 tiers detected. Calorie Counter + runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Intermittent Fasting Tracker: runs "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter + or Intermittent Fasting Tracker:? v
Intermittent Fasting Tracker: edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.1 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter + 26K ratings, Intermittent Fasting Tracker: 47K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter + vs Intermittent Fasting Tracker: revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $165.2K for Calorie Counter + and $301.4K for Intermittent Fasting Tracker: are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter + or Intermittent Fasting Tracker: to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.