Calorie Counter + vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Calorie Counter +
NutraTech Ltd
App Store
$165.1K/mo
~$1.98M/yr · 2.8M installs
VS
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Stronger By Science Technologies LLC
App Store
$74.8K/mo
~$897.7K/yr · 1.5M installs
Revenue winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+121% vs other
Installs winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+90% vs other
MAU winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+89% vs other
Rating winner
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker wins
+1% vs other
Why Calorie Counter + is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calorie Counter + earns roughly 2× more per month than MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - $165.1K vs $74.8K.
- Aggressive pricing. Calorie Counter + undercuts at $6.99/mo vs $9.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Calorie Counter + has ~2.8M lifetime installs vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's ~1.5M - 1.9× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Calorie Counter + runs 7 IAP tiers vs 6 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calorie Counter + report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie Counter +
vs
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$165.1K
◀
$74.8K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.98M
◀
$897.7K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
◀
1.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
731K
◀
386K
App Store rating
4.77★
▶
4.81★
Total ratings
26K
◀
13K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
▶
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
6 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 24, 2014
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- 115.5 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 12.11.0
- Languages
- English, Spanish
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 15, 2021
- Last updated
- Apr 1, 2026
- File size
- 241.1 MB
- Content rating
- 9+
- Version
- 5.7.6
- Languages
- English, Japanese
Calorie Counter + trajectory
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie Counter + or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Calorie Counter + earns about $165.1K per month, while MacroFactor - Macro Tracker earns about $74.8K. That is a 2.2× revenue gap (~$90.3K more per month for Calorie Counter +). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter + ≈ $1.98M/year, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker ≈ $897.7K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter + or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
Calorie Counter + leads with about 2.8M estimated downloads vs 1.5M for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker - a 1.9× gap. Calorie Counter +'s App Store downloads are estimated from 26K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 13K ratings.
Are Calorie Counter + and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter + and MacroFactor - Macro Tracker offer? v
Calorie Counter +: IAP range 7 tiers detected. MacroFactor - Macro Tracker: IAP range 6 tiers detected. Calorie Counter + runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; MacroFactor - Macro Tracker runs "Subscription (~$6.00/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter + or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker? v
MacroFactor - Macro Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter + 26K ratings, MacroFactor - Macro Tracker 13K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter + vs MacroFactor - Macro Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $165.1K for Calorie Counter + and $74.8K for MacroFactor - Macro Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter + or MacroFactor - Macro Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.