Calorie Counter + vs OtterLife: AI Health Tracker
Calorie Counter +
NutraTech Ltd
App Store
$166.2K/mo
~$1.99M/yr · 2.8M installs
VS
OtterLife: AI Health Tracker
If Tech
App Store
$13.5K/mo
~$162.4K/yr · 103K installs
Revenue winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+1128% vs other
Installs winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+2662% vs other
MAU winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+2705% vs other
Rating winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+5% vs other
Why Calorie Counter + is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calorie Counter + earns roughly 12× more per month than OtterLife: AI Health Tracker - $166.2K vs $13.5K.
- Aggressive pricing. Calorie Counter + undercuts at $6.99/mo vs $15.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Calorie Counter + has ~2.8M lifetime installs vs OtterLife: AI Health Tracker's ~103K - 27.6× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Calorie Counter + runs 7 IAP tiers vs 5 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calorie Counter + report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie Counter +
vs
OtterLife: AI Health Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$166.2K
◀
$13.5K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.99M
◀
$162.4K
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
◀
103K
Monthly active users (est.)?
735K
◀
26K
App Store rating
4.77★
◀
4.53★
Total ratings
26K
◀
1K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
▶
$15.99
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
5 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 24, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 122.9 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 12.15.0
- Languages
- English, Spanish
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Feb 7, 2024
- Last updated
- Jun 18, 2026
- File size
- 333.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.0.6
- Languages
- English, French, German, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese +3 more
Calorie Counter + trajectory
OtterLife: AI Health Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie Counter + or OtterLife: AI Health Tracker? v
Calorie Counter + earns about $166.2K per month, while OtterLife: AI Health Tracker earns about $13.5K. That is a 12.3× revenue gap (~$152.7K more per month for Calorie Counter +). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter + ≈ $1.99M/year, OtterLife: AI Health Tracker ≈ $162.4K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter + or OtterLife: AI Health Tracker? v
Calorie Counter + leads with about 2.8M estimated downloads vs 103K for OtterLife: AI Health Tracker - a 27.6× gap. Calorie Counter +'s App Store downloads are estimated from 26K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. OtterLife: AI Health Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 1K ratings.
Are Calorie Counter + and OtterLife: AI Health Tracker in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter + and OtterLife: AI Health Tracker offer? v
Calorie Counter +: IAP range 7 tiers detected. OtterLife: AI Health Tracker: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Calorie Counter + runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; OtterLife: AI Health Tracker runs "Subscription (~$15.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter + or OtterLife: AI Health Tracker? v
Calorie Counter + edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.2 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter + 26K ratings, OtterLife: AI Health Tracker 1K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter + vs OtterLife: AI Health Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $166.2K for Calorie Counter + and $13.5K for OtterLife: AI Health Tracker are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter + or OtterLife: AI Health Tracker to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.