Calorie Counter + vs Simple Interval Timer
Calorie Counter +
NutraTech Ltd
App Store
$166.2K/mo
~$1.99M/yr · 2.8M installs
VS
Simple Interval Timer
CELEST Watches
Google Play
$2/mo
~$29/yr · 408 installs
Revenue winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+8309900% vs other
Installs winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+695893% vs other
MAU winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+735664% vs other
Rating winner
Calorie Counter + wins
+477% vs other
Why Calorie Counter + is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Calorie Counter + earns roughly 83100× more per month than Simple Interval Timer - $166.2K vs $2.
- Subscription model. Calorie Counter + runs a $6.99/mo subscription that compounds; Simple Interval Timer relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Calorie Counter + has ~2.8M lifetime installs vs Simple Interval Timer's ~408 - 6959.9× the funnel top.
- More monetization surfaces. Calorie Counter + runs 7 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Calorie Counter + report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Calorie Counter +
vs
Simple Interval Timer
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$166.2K
◀
$2
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.99M
◀
$29
Lifetime installs (est.)
2.8M
◀
408
Monthly active users (est.)?
735K
◀
99.96
App Store rating
4.77★
◀
-
Total ratings
26K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$6.99
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
7 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Sep 24, 2014
- Last updated
- Jun 29, 2026
- File size
- 122.9 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 12.15.0
- Languages
- English, Spanish
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- USD0.49
- Released
- Nov 28, 2025
- Last updated
- Apr 19, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- VARY
- Languages
- -
Calorie Counter + trajectory
Simple Interval Timer trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Calorie Counter + or Simple Interval Timer? v
Calorie Counter + earns about $166.2K per month, while Simple Interval Timer earns about $2. That is a 83100.0× revenue gap (~$166.2K more per month for Calorie Counter +). Annual revenue: Calorie Counter + ≈ $1.99M/year, Simple Interval Timer ≈ $29/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Calorie Counter + or Simple Interval Timer? v
Calorie Counter + leads with about 2.8M estimated downloads vs 408 for Simple Interval Timer - a 6959.9× gap. Calorie Counter +'s App Store downloads are estimated from 26K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Simple Interval Timer reports 100+ installs on Google Play.
Are Calorie Counter + and Simple Interval Timer in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Calorie Counter + and Simple Interval Timer offer? v
Calorie Counter +: IAP range 7 tiers detected. Simple Interval Timer: no IAP detected on the public listing. Calorie Counter + runs a "Subscription (~$6.99/mo)" monetization model; Simple Interval Timer runs "Paid app ($0.49)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Calorie Counter + or Simple Interval Timer? v
Calorie Counter + edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 4.8 stars). Rating volume: Calorie Counter + 26K ratings, Simple Interval Timer 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Calorie Counter + vs Simple Interval Timer revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $166.2K for Calorie Counter + and $2 for Simple Interval Timer are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Calorie Counter + or Simple Interval Timer to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.