Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker vs Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker
Reform LLC
App Store
$43.7K/mo
~$524.4K/yr · 624K installs
VS
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans
Fitia Technologies
Google Play
$674.7K/mo
~$8.10M/yr · 13.5M installs
Revenue winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+1444% vs other
Installs winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+2069% vs other
MAU winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+634% vs other
Rating winner
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans wins
+0% vs other
Why Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans earns roughly 15× more per month than Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker - $674.7K vs $43.7K.
- Aggressive pricing. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans undercuts at $9.44/mo vs $11.99/mo - converts a higher % of free users.
- Bigger install base. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans has ~13.5M lifetime installs vs Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker's ~624K - 21.7× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$43.7K
▶
$674.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$524.4K
▶
$8.10M
Lifetime installs (est.)
624K
▶
13.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
162K
▶
1.2M
App Store rating
4.83★
▶
4.83★
Total ratings
8K
▶
350K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$11.99
◀
$9.44
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 21, 2020
- Last updated
- Jan 12, 2026
- File size
- 111.6 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 2.74.4732
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jun 17, 2019
- Last updated
- May 6, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 24.0.1
- Languages
- -
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker trajectory
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans earns about $674.7K per month, while Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker earns about $43.7K. That is a 15.4× revenue gap (~$631.0K more per month for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans). Annual revenue: Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker ≈ $524.4K/year, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans ≈ $8.10M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans leads with about 13.5M estimated downloads vs 624K for Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker - a 21.7× gap. Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 8K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans reports 10,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans offer? v
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans: IAP range $0.99 - $89.99 per item. Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$8.33/mo)" monetization model; Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans runs "Subscription (~$9.44/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans? v
Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker 8K ratings, Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans 762 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker vs Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $43.7K for Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and $674.7K for Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Fitia: Calorie Counter & Plans to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
