Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker
Reform LLC
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 629K installs
VS
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner
Yuca
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 10.5M installs
Revenue winnerTied
Installs winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+1570% vs other
MAU winner
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner wins
+1152% vs other
Rating winner
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker wins
+0% vs other
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
=
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
=
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
629K
▶
10.5M
Monthly active users (est.)?
164K
▶
2.0M
App Store rating
4.83★
◀
4.82★
Total ratings
8K
▶
96K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
=
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 21, 2020
- Last updated
- Jul 1, 2026
- File size
- 101.8 MB
- Content rating
- 17+
- Version
- 2.76.5784
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 9, 2017
- Last updated
- Jul 2, 2026
- File size
- 204.1 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.1
- Languages
- English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker trajectory
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner earns about $0 per month, while Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap. Annual revenue: Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker ≈ $0/year, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner leads with about 10.5M estimated downloads vs 629K for Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker - a 16.7× gap. Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 8K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner's App Store downloads are estimated from 96K ratings.
Are Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
Do Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner have in-app purchases? v
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker does not appear to offer in-app purchases on its public listing. Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner does not appear to offer in-app purchases. Monetization model: Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)", Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)".
Which has better ratings, Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner? v
Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.8 (gap of 0.0 stars). Rating volume: Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker 8K ratings, Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner 96K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker vs Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker and $0 for Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Carbon - Macro Coach & Tracker or Yuka - Food & Cosmetic Scanner to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
