Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
Chello Publishing Limited
Google Play
$39.7K/mo
~$476.6K/yr · 342K installs
VS
Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker
Habitflows Technologies
Google Play
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 13 installs
Revenue winner
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes wins
+3971400% vs other
Installs winner
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes wins
+2630246% vs other
MAU winner
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes wins
+2007552% vs other
Rating winner
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes wins
+274% vs other
Why Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes earns roughly 39714× more per month than Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker - $39.7K vs $0.
- Subscription model. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes runs a $18.10/mo subscription that compounds; Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
- Bigger install base. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes has ~342K lifetime installs vs Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker's ~13 - 26303.5× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes sits at 2.74★ vs 0.00★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$39.7K
◀
$0
Annual revenue (est.)
$476.6K
◀
$0
Lifetime installs (est.)
342K
◀
13
Monthly active users (est.)?
64K
◀
3.185
App Store rating
2.74★
◀
-
Total ratings
3K
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$18.10
◀
No sub
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Apr 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 5.52.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- -
- Last updated
- Apr 27, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 2.0.3
- Languages
- -
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes trajectory
Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker? v
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes earns about $39.7K per month, while Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$39.7K more per month for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes). Annual revenue: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes ≈ $476.6K/year, Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker ≈ $0/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker? v
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes leads with about 342K estimated downloads vs 13 for Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker - a 26303.5× gap. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker reports 10+ installs on Google Play.
Are Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker offer? v
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes: IAP range $7.99 - $40.99 per item. Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker: no IAP detected on the public listing. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes runs a "Subscription (~$18.10/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker runs "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker? v
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 2.7 stars). Rating volume: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes 43 ratings, Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $39.7K for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and $0 for Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Gluco AI Easy Diabetes Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
