Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
Chello Publishing Limited
Google Play
$39.7K/mo
~$476.6K/yr · 342K installs
VS
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Yazio
Google Play
$4.68M/mo
~$56.19M/yr · 55.7M installs
Revenue winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+11690% vs other
Installs winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+16181% vs other
MAU winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+7300% vs other
Rating winner
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker wins
+61% vs other
Why Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker is winning
Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns roughly 118× more per month than Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - $4.68M vs $39.7K.
- Premium pricing. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker charges $45.79/mo vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's $18.10/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker has ~55.7M lifetime installs vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's ~342K - 162.8× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker sits at 4.40★ vs 2.74★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
vs
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$39.7K
▶
$4.68M
Annual revenue (est.)
$476.6K
▶
$56.19M
Lifetime installs (est.)
342K
▶
55.7M
Monthly active users (est.)?
64K
▶
4.7M
App Store rating
2.74★
▶
4.40★
Total ratings
3K
▶
805K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$18.10
▶
$45.79
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
=
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Mar 16, 2012
- Last updated
- Apr 24, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 5.52.1
- Languages
- -
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Apr 23, 2014
- Last updated
- May 5, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 12.83.1
- Languages
- -
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes trajectory
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker earns about $4.68M per month, while Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes earns about $39.7K. That is a 117.9× revenue gap (~$4.64M more per month for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker). Annual revenue: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes ≈ $476.6K/year, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker ≈ $56.19M/year. Estimates are derived from public Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker leads with about 55.7M estimated downloads vs 342K for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - a 162.8× gap. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker reports 50,000,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker in the same Google Play category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker offer? v
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes: IAP range $7.99 - $40.99 per item. Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker: IAP range $6.99 - $299.99 per item. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes runs a "Subscription (~$18.10/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker runs "Subscription (~$45.79/mo, fitness-sub)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker? v
Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker edges ahead with ★ 4.4 vs ★ 2.7 (gap of 1.7 stars). Rating volume: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes 43 ratings, Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker 3K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $39.7K for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and $4.68M for Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker are derived from Google Play grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Yazio: AI Calorie Tracker to a different Google Play app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.