Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes
Chello Publishing
App Store
$140/mo
~$1.7K/yr · 1K installs
VS
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition
Fitness Camp
Google Play
$25.2K/mo
~$302.8K/yr · 210K installs
Revenue winner
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition wins
+17921% vs other
Installs winner
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition wins
+15449% vs other
MAU winner
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition wins
+10576% vs other
Rating winner
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes wins
+365% vs other
Why Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition earns roughly 180× more per month than Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - $25.2K vs $140.
- Premium pricing. Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition charges $30.02/mo vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's $7.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
- Bigger install base. Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition has ~210K lifetime installs vs Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's ~1K - 155.5× the funnel top.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
vs
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$140
▶
$25.2K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.7K
▶
$302.8K
Lifetime installs (est.)
1K
▶
210K
Monthly active users (est.)?
361.8
▶
39K
App Store rating
3.65★
◀
-
Total ratings
54
◀
0
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$7.99
▶
$30.02
IAP tiers detected
5 tiers
◀
0 tiers
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Aug 30, 2010
- Last updated
- Apr 25, 2026
- File size
- 94.5 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 5.52.1
- Languages
- English
- Category
- Health & Fitness
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 21, 2025
- Last updated
- May 4, 2026
- File size
- -
- Content rating
- Everyone
- Version
- 1.0.65
- Languages
- -
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes trajectory
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition? v
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition earns about $25.2K per month, while Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes earns about $140. That is a 180.2× revenue gap (~$25.1K more per month for Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition). Annual revenue: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes ≈ $1.7K/year, Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition ≈ $302.8K/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store / Google Play signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition? v
Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition leads with about 210K estimated downloads vs 1K for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes - a 155.5× gap. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes's App Store downloads are estimated from 54 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition reports 100,000+ installs on Google Play.
Are Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition in the same App Store category on each store and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Health & Fitness category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition offer? v
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes: IAP range 5 tiers detected. Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition: IAP range $9.49 - $94.99 per item. Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes runs a "Subscription (~$7.99/mo, fitness-sub)" monetization model; Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition runs "Subscription (~$30.02/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition? v
Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes edges ahead with a higher overall score (gap of 3.6 stars). Rating volume: Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes 54 ratings, Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition 0 ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes vs Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $140 for Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes and $25.2K for Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition are derived from App Store grossing rank / Google Play install ranges, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Health & Fitness) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Carbs & Cals: Diet & Diabetes or Fitness Camp: Sport, Nutrition to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store or Google Play links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.
