ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker vs NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals

ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker

MIU Digital Limited
App Store
$108/mo
~$1.3K/yr · 10K installs
VS

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals

The New York Times Company
App Store
$929.7K/mo
~$11.16M/yr · 80.1M installs
Revenue winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +860703% vs other
Installs winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +833973% vs other
MAU winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +431317% vs other
Rating winner NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals wins +11% vs other

Why NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals earns roughly 8608× more per month than ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker - $929.7K vs $108.
  2. Premium pricing. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals charges $4.99/mo vs ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker's $2.99/mo - higher ARPU per converted user.
  3. Bigger install base. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals has ~80.1M lifetime installs vs ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker's ~10K - 8340.7× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs 9 IAP tiers vs 3 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker
vs
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$108
▶
$929.7K
Annual revenue (est.)
$1.3K
▶
$11.16M
Lifetime installs (est.)
10K
▶
80.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1K
▶
4.8M
App Store rating
4.44★
▶
4.91★
Total ratings
192
▶
534K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$2.99
▶
$4.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
▶
9 tiers

ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker

MIU Digital Limited
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Jun 16, 2023
Last updated
Apr 10, 2026
File size
93.6 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
3.1.4
Languages
English
View full ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker report →

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals

The New York Times Company
App Store
Category
Food & Drink
Price
Free
Released
Sep 17, 2014
Last updated
May 7, 2026
File size
209.4 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
4.157.0
Languages
English
View full NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals report →

ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker App Store page →NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals App Store page →

Related comparisons

Chefgpt AI Calories Tracker iOS vs Fussy Toddler Recipes iOSChefgpt AI Calories Tracker iOS vs Mcdonald S Offers and Delivery iOSChefgpt AI Calories Tracker iOS vs Meal Planner Amp Grocery List AndroidChefgpt AI Calories Tracker iOS vs Love Manuela iOSChefgpt AI Calories Tracker iOS vs Too Good to Go End Food Waste iOSChefgpt AI Calories Tracker iOS vs Doordash Food Grocery More iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals earns about $929.7K per month, while ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker earns about $108. That is a 8608.0× revenue gap (~$929.6K more per month for NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals). Annual revenue: ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker ≈ $1.3K/year, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals ≈ $11.16M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals leads with about 80.1M estimated downloads vs 10K for ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker - a 8340.7× gap. ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker's App Store downloads are estimated from 192 ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals's App Store downloads are estimated from 534K ratings.
Are ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker and NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Food & Drink category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker and NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals offer? v
ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker: IAP range 3 tiers detected. NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals: IAP range 9 tiers detected. ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker runs a "Subscription (~$2.99/mo)" monetization model; NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals runs "Subscription (~$5.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals? v
NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals edges ahead with ★ 4.9 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker 192 ratings, NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals 534K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker vs NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $108 for ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker and $929.7K for NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Food & Drink) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare ChefGPT: AI Calories Tracker or NYT Cooking: Quick Tasty Meals to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.