Classic Words With Friends vs NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell

Classic Words With Friends

Zynga Inc.
App Store
$36.5K/mo
~$438.4K/yr · 9.1M installs
VS

NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell

The New York Times Company
App Store
$240.9K/mo
~$2.89M/yr · 30.1M installs
Revenue winner NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell wins +559% vs other
Installs winner NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell wins +230% vs other
MAU winner NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell wins +153% vs other
Rating winner NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell wins +8% vs other

Why NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell earns roughly 7× more per month than Classic Words With Friends - $240.9K vs $36.5K.
  2. Subscription model. NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell runs a $5.99/mo subscription that compounds; Classic Words With Friends relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell has ~30.1M lifetime installs vs Classic Words With Friends's ~9.1M - 3.3× the funnel top.
  4. Better app store reviews. NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell sits at 4.84★ vs 4.48★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Classic Words With Friends
vs
NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$36.5K
▶
$240.9K
Annual revenue (est.)
$438.4K
▶
$2.89M
Lifetime installs (est.)
9.1M
▶
30.1M
Monthly active users (est.)?
1.8M
▶
4.5M
App Store rating
4.48★
▶
4.84★
Total ratings
83K
▶
154K
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$5.99
IAP tiers detected
9 tiers
◀
2 tiers

Classic Words With Friends

Zynga Inc.
App Store
Category
Games
Price
Free
Released
Jul 19, 2009
Last updated
Apr 28, 2026
File size
331.0 MB
Content rating
4+
Version
53.02.01
Languages
English, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish
View full Classic Words With Friends report →

NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell

The New York Times Company
App Store
Category
Games
Price
Free
Released
Jan 20, 2026
Last updated
May 5, 2026
File size
106.3 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
2.14.0
Languages
English
View full NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell report →

Classic Words With Friends trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Classic Words With Friends App Store page →NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell App Store page →

Related comparisons

Classic Words With Friends iOS vs Minecraft Play With Friends iOSClassic Words With Friends iOS vs Plague INC iOSClassic Words With Friends iOS vs Geometry Dash iOSClassic Words With Friends iOS vs Gambonanza iOSClassic Words With Friends iOS vs Monopoly the Board Game iOSClassic Words With Friends iOS vs Scritchy Scratchy iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Classic Words With Friends or NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell? v
NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell earns about $240.9K per month, while Classic Words With Friends earns about $36.5K. That is a 6.6× revenue gap (~$204.4K more per month for NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell). Annual revenue: Classic Words With Friends ≈ $438.4K/year, NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell ≈ $2.89M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Classic Words With Friends or NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell? v
NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell leads with about 30.1M estimated downloads vs 9.1M for Classic Words With Friends - a 3.3× gap. Classic Words With Friends's App Store downloads are estimated from 83K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell's App Store downloads are estimated from 154K ratings.
Are Classic Words With Friends and NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Games category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Classic Words With Friends and NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell offer? v
Classic Words With Friends: IAP range 9 tiers detected. NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell: IAP range 2 tiers detected. Classic Words With Friends runs a "Free casual game · ad-supported (~$0.04/MAU)" monetization model; NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell runs "Free casual game · ads + tiny sub take (~$0.08/MAU)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Classic Words With Friends or NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell? v
NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.5 (gap of 0.4 stars). Rating volume: Classic Words With Friends 83K ratings, NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell 154K ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Classic Words With Friends vs NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $36.5K for Classic Words With Friends and $240.9K for NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Games) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Classic Words With Friends or NYT Crossplay: Play and Spell to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.