Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs Google Photos: Backup & Edit
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
Spark Dynamic
App Store
$180.0K/mo
~$2.16M/yr · 1.8M installs
VS
Google Photos: Backup & Edit
Google
App Store
$3.94M/mo
~$47.27M/yr · 239.3M installs
Revenue winner
Google Photos: Backup & Edit wins
+2088% vs other
Installs winner
Google Photos: Backup & Edit wins
+13118% vs other
MAU winner
Google Photos: Backup & Edit wins
+2089% vs other
Rating winner
Google Photos: Backup & Edit wins
+11% vs other
Why Google Photos: Backup & Edit is winning
Top 3 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.
- Google Photos: Backup & Edit earns roughly 22× more per month than Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - $3.94M vs $180.0K.
- Bigger install base. Google Photos: Backup & Edit has ~239.3M lifetime installs vs Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's ~1.8M - 132.2× the funnel top.
- Better app store reviews. Google Photos: Backup & Edit sits at 4.83★ vs 4.35★ - store algorithms reward higher-rated apps with more impressions.
→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full Google Photos: Backup & Edit report
Side-by-side metrics
Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
vs
Google Photos: Backup & Edit
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$180.0K
▶
$3.94M
Annual revenue (est.)
$2.16M
▶
$47.27M
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.8M
▶
239.3M
Monthly active users (est.)?
558K
▶
12.2M
App Store rating
4.35★
▶
4.83★
Total ratings
16K
▶
1.4M
US grossing rank
-
=
-
Cheapest monthly sub
$9.99
=
$9.99
IAP tiers detected
3 tiers
=
3 tiers
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- Jan 7, 2023
- Last updated
- Jun 24, 2026
- File size
- 98.3 MB
- Content rating
- 12+
- Version
- 3.0.0
- Languages
- Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Japanese +3 more
- Category
- Photo & Video
- Price
- Free
- Released
- May 28, 2015
- Last updated
- Jun 26, 2026
- File size
- 416.7 MB
- Content rating
- 4+
- Version
- 7.82.0
- Languages
- Arabic, BN, Bulgarian, Catalan, Croatian, Czech +33 more
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters trajectory
Google Photos: Backup & Edit trajectory
FAQ
Which makes more money, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Google Photos: Backup & Edit? v
Google Photos: Backup & Edit earns about $3.94M per month, while Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns about $180.0K. That is a 21.9× revenue gap (~$3.76M more per month for Google Photos: Backup & Edit). Annual revenue: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters ≈ $2.16M/year, Google Photos: Backup & Edit ≈ $47.27M/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Google Photos: Backup & Edit? v
Google Photos: Backup & Edit leads with about 239.3M estimated downloads vs 1.8M for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - a 132.2× gap. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. Google Photos: Backup & Edit's App Store downloads are estimated from 1.4M ratings.
Are Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and Google Photos: Backup & Edit in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and Google Photos: Backup & Edit offer? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Google Photos: Backup & Edit: IAP range 3 tiers detected. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs a "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)" monetization model; Google Photos: Backup & Edit runs "Subscription (~$9.99/mo)". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Google Photos: Backup & Edit? v
Google Photos: Backup & Edit edges ahead with ★ 4.8 vs ★ 4.4 (gap of 0.5 stars). Rating volume: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters 16K ratings, Google Photos: Backup & Edit 1.4M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs Google Photos: Backup & Edit revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $180.0K for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and $3.94M for Google Photos: Backup & Edit are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or Google Photos: Backup & Edit to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.