Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs YouTube

Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters

Spark Dynamic
App Store
$0/mo
~$0/yr · 1.7M installs
VS

YouTube

Google
App Store
$381.33M/mo
~$4.58B/yr · 5.0B installs
Revenue winner YouTube wins +38132723700% vs other
Installs winner YouTube wins +285724% vs other
MAU winner YouTube wins +501020% vs other
Rating winner YouTube wins +8% vs other

Why YouTube is winning

Top 4 reasons - backed by the public App Store / Play Store numbers.

  1. YouTube earns roughly 381327237× more per month than Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - $381.33M vs $0.
  2. Subscription model. YouTube runs a $20.99/mo subscription that compounds; Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters relies on one-shot IAP or ads.
  3. Bigger install base. YouTube has ~5.0B lifetime installs vs Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's ~1.7M - 2858.2× the funnel top.
  4. More monetization surfaces. YouTube runs 4 IAP tiers vs 0 - more chances to convert users at the right price.

→ Find more apps with this revenue gap · Full YouTube report

Side-by-side metrics

Bars scale to whichever app is bigger on that row. Green = winner.

Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters
vs
YouTube
Monthly revenue (est.)?
$0
▶
$381.33M
Annual revenue (est.)
$0
▶
$4.58B
Lifetime installs (est.)
1.7M
▶
5.0B
Monthly active users (est.)?
539K
▶
2.7B
App Store rating
4.34★
▶
4.67★
Total ratings
16K
▶
47.1M
US grossing rank
-
▶
#2
Cheapest monthly sub
No sub
▶
$20.99
IAP tiers detected
0 tiers
▶
4 tiers

Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters

Spark Dynamic
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Jan 7, 2023
Last updated
Apr 21, 2026
File size
108.8 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
2.8.3
Languages
Arabic, English, French, German, Indonesian, Japanese +3 more
View full Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters report →

YouTube

Google
App Store
Category
Photo & Video
Price
Free
Released
Sep 11, 2012
Last updated
May 3, 2026
File size
341.1 MB
Content rating
12+
Version
21.18.4
Languages
AF, SQ, AM, Arabic, HY, AZ +66 more
View full YouTube report →

Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

YouTube trajectory

JunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMay

Related app pages

Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters App Store page →YouTube App Store page →

Related comparisons

Cosmo AI Editor Hair Filters iOS vs Photo Scan App by Photomyne iOSCosmo AI Editor Hair Filters iOS vs Promptsmart PRO Teleprompter iOSCosmo AI Editor Hair Filters iOS vs Photopills iOSCapcut Photo Video Editor iOS vs Cosmo AI Editor Hair Filters iOSCosmo AI Editor Hair Filters iOS vs Instagram iOSCanva AI Video Photo Editor iOS vs Cosmo AI Editor Hair Filters iOS

Compare another pair

FAQ

Which makes more money, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or YouTube? v
YouTube earns about $381.33M per month, while Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters earns about $0. That is a ∞× revenue gap (~$381.33M more per month for YouTube). Annual revenue: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters ≈ $0/year, YouTube ≈ $4.58B/year. Estimates are derived from public App Store signals - grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings and category benchmarks.
Which has more downloads, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or YouTube? v
YouTube leads with about 5.0B estimated downloads vs 1.7M for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters - a 2858.2× gap. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters's App Store downloads are estimated from 16K ratings × the standard 1:75 ratio. YouTube's App Store downloads are estimated from 47.1M ratings.
Are Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and YouTube in the same App Store category and competing for the same money? v
Yes - both apps sit in the Photo & Video category, which means they compete directly for the same paying users and category-level wallet share. Direct competitors, head-to-head.
What in-app purchases and subscription pricing do Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and YouTube offer? v
Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters: no IAP detected on the public listing. YouTube: IAP range 4 tiers detected. Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters runs a "No App Store revenue (monetizes off-store)" monetization model; YouTube runs "Subscription (~$20.99/mo) · calibrated by US grossing rank #2". Scraped tier prices and detected subscription pricing drive the bulk of the per-app revenue estimate above.
Which has better ratings, Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or YouTube? v
YouTube edges ahead with ★ 4.7 vs ★ 4.3 (gap of 0.3 stars). Rating volume: Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters 16K ratings, YouTube 47.1M ratings. Higher rating volume = stronger ASO signal even when star averages are close.
How accurate are these Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters vs YouTube revenue estimates? v
Directional - typically within 2-3× of actual money earned for popular apps. The $0 for Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters and $381.33M for YouTube are derived from App Store grossing rank, scraped IAP tiers, ratings volume and category benchmarks (Photo & Video) - net of the 15-30% Apple/Google store cut. Real revenue depends on country mix, retention, refunds and ad fill rate, none of which Apple or Google publish.
How do I compare Cosmo: AI Editor, Hair Filters or YouTube to a different App Store app? v
Use the search box at the bottom of this page or paste any two App Store links into the homepage tool. We auto-generate a permanent comparison URL with revenue, downloads, IAP tiers, subscription pricing and grossing rank for both apps.